| | |
Why Linux doesnt need an anti virus
![]() |
•
•
•
•
My linux mail server keeps sending mail infected with windows viruses to my windows pc (for some reason my virus scanner only finds linux viruses?) - any way to fix this?

clamav
Windows is full of viruses because all hackers hate Bill Gates and love to attack the BIG GUY. Microsoft did NOT write their code based on security... security came AFTERWARDS and was more like a FEATURE than a standard.
Security should be a standard... not a feature.
When Ubuntu or whatever distro finally gets a 50/50 market share with Microsoft, we WILL see attacks on Linux. Because, hackers want to attack the OS with the most usage for maximum damage.
However, Linux and Open Source comminity are ULTRA FAST at fixing the virus, spyware problems compared to Microsoft because Microsoft is Buerocratic and SLOW to respond.
Linux has antivirus software ready and waiting on Stand By called CLAM/AV. It is not in use or needed at the moment!!! But, as a previous post stated Linux users should not live in a fool's paradise meaning... Oh Linux is superior and immune to viruses.
You see... it is about who actually cares in the end. More people that do actual code FIXES care about Linux and Open Source then the 50,000+ Microsofty's at M$.
It is all about numbers and Open Source / Linux clearly has more and that means will dominate in the end.
Security should be a standard... not a feature.
When Ubuntu or whatever distro finally gets a 50/50 market share with Microsoft, we WILL see attacks on Linux. Because, hackers want to attack the OS with the most usage for maximum damage.
However, Linux and Open Source comminity are ULTRA FAST at fixing the virus, spyware problems compared to Microsoft because Microsoft is Buerocratic and SLOW to respond.
Linux has antivirus software ready and waiting on Stand By called CLAM/AV. It is not in use or needed at the moment!!! But, as a previous post stated Linux users should not live in a fool's paradise meaning... Oh Linux is superior and immune to viruses.
You see... it is about who actually cares in the end. More people that do actual code FIXES care about Linux and Open Source then the 50,000+ Microsofty's at M$.
It is all about numbers and Open Source / Linux clearly has more and that means will dominate in the end.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- New Anti Virus ? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Which Anti-virus to choose (*nix Software)
- Firewall and Anti virus (Mac Software)
- Symantec auto anti-virus updates (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- Suspected virus issue (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- free anti virus programmes for XP (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
Other Threads in the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Forum
- Previous Thread: Apache Ant and Java with Fedora
- Next Thread: partitioning space in ubuntu
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
age-related baremetal chrome cio cloudcomputing code computers crystalballsunday developers development distributions distro elderly embedded google http://expertcore.org/ jauntyjackalope kernel library linus linux microsoft multi-core netgear newbies openoffice.org operating operatingsystems parallel performance processing redhat routers smp studios system systembuilders systemintegrators terminalservices thecloud thinclients tools ubuntu users virtualization vmware webbased wikis windows xenon






