•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro section within the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 403,493 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 4,240 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Getting Started and Choosing a Distro advertiser: Lunarpages Linux Web Hosting
Views: 13005 | Replies: 58
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Rep Power: 0
Solved Threads: 0
Most of the posts here are FUD.
Linux does have virii, the first was in 1995.
However because you do not have admin rights by default on linux (with the exception of one distribution) they have minimal effect - they cannot infect the system; possibly the local user might get stung but that's all they can do, they can't propogate, they can't access the system.
Its nothing to do with numbers of users, market share open vs closed source, its down to basic errors in Microsoft products.
Linux was largely developed over internet, Microsoft under-estimated the demand & effect of networking.
I do have antivirus installed, mainly so I don't pass Windows malware onto Windows users.
see: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/10...ndows_viruses/
"Opinion To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it, writes SecurityFocus columnist Scott Granneman."
Linux does have virii, the first was in 1995.
However because you do not have admin rights by default on linux (with the exception of one distribution) they have minimal effect - they cannot infect the system; possibly the local user might get stung but that's all they can do, they can't propogate, they can't access the system.
Its nothing to do with numbers of users, market share open vs closed source, its down to basic errors in Microsoft products.
Linux was largely developed over internet, Microsoft under-estimated the demand & effect of networking.
I do have antivirus installed, mainly so I don't pass Windows malware onto Windows users.
see: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/10...ndows_viruses/
"Opinion To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it, writes SecurityFocus columnist Scott Granneman."
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England (LOL)
Posts: 11,937
Reputation:
Rep Power: 30
Solved Threads: 268
exactly as i said
•
•
•
•
vista and linux are the same in terms of security. The only reason vista has a higjer incidence is because users are TOTAL RETARDS as they run as administrators, not limited accounts. UAC goes some way to fixing this. If everyone on linux operated as root then it would be just as virus prone
Last edited by jbennet : Mar 11th, 2008 at 6:46 pm.
TRY MY SUGGESTIONS AT YOUR OWN RISK!
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England (LOL)
Posts: 11,937
Reputation:
Rep Power: 30
Solved Threads: 268
I hate backseat moderating, but "dickheads" isn't a family friendly word.
And, no. Windows isn't less secure, people just don't know how to properly use the security. You won't get virii if you stay off of malicious websites, and don't sign up for stupid newsletters.
Again, if you stay as a limited account, and not as root, you'll be fine. On Windows -- stay limited, not as Administrator. I firmly believe that Windows should just abandon "UAC" and just require a password for every admin-run program.
And, no. Windows isn't less secure, people just don't know how to properly use the security. You won't get virii if you stay off of malicious websites, and don't sign up for stupid newsletters.
Again, if you stay as a limited account, and not as root, you'll be fine. On Windows -- stay limited, not as Administrator. I firmly believe that Windows should just abandon "UAC" and just require a password for every admin-run program.
Toshiba M115 ● 1.49 GB DDR-2 RAM ● 1.6 GHz Centrino Duo ● 80GB HDD ● Windows XP Media Center Edition
![]() |
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
•
•
•
•
apple bbc cellphone computer core debian dell desktop development enterprise fedora fiji fix games gentoo google gpl hardware ibm install ipod kernel laptop linux malware microsoft mobile news novell open open source openoffice operating os reactos red hat satnav security server source ssvichosst sun system trojan ubuntu unix virus vista web windows
- New Anti Virus ? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Which Anti-virus to choose (*nix Software)
- Firewall and Anti virus (Mac Software)
- Symantec auto anti-virus updates (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- Suspected virus issue (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- free anti virus programmes for XP (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
Other Threads in the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Forum
- Previous Thread: counting -| in Linux using grep
- Next Thread: Server with Fedora 9



dont worry about it
Linear Mode