| | |
Why Linux doesnt need an anti virus
![]() |
•
•
•
•
I hate backseat moderating, but "dickheads" isn't a family friendly word..
•
•
•
•
I firmly believe that Windows should just abandon "UAC" and just require a password for every admin-run program.
Last edited by evstevemd; Oct 25th, 2008 at 1:34 pm. Reason: Some Make up!
Atheist: God is man made imagination, he doesn't exist!
Theist: It's okay, can you imagine anything else that doesn't exist?
Junior MD --- Python, C++ and PHP
Theist: It's okay, can you imagine anything else that doesn't exist?
Junior MD --- Python, C++ and PHP
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
It is far more difficult to attack a Linux system than in Windows.
On the other hand, when it comes to Linux, the user normally has stronger computer knowledge in comparison to Windows users, thus are more aware of virus thread.
Thanks
On the other hand, when it comes to Linux, the user normally has stronger computer knowledge in comparison to Windows users, thus are more aware of virus thread.
Thanks
Patrick Ooi, http://www.webhyper.com
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
While it is true that the average Linux user knows more about system security, and computers in general, that's not necessarily the reason that Linux has better security.
My take on it is that Linux is built with security in mind. Windows is built with security as an afterthought.
Linux is open source, and easier for the open source developers of the world (100's of thousands) to find holes, security flaws etc and patch them. Windows needs to rely on their on-staff developers who are limited in numbers and resources. As a for-profit company, they need to be sure that everything comes in on time and on budget. That can only result in one thing: the most important security holes being plugged and the others either put off to a later date or not dealt with at all.
I think it should be obvious that Windows ranks lower in security when the Service Packs alone are the size of most Linux distributions.
My take on it is that Linux is built with security in mind. Windows is built with security as an afterthought.
Linux is open source, and easier for the open source developers of the world (100's of thousands) to find holes, security flaws etc and patch them. Windows needs to rely on their on-staff developers who are limited in numbers and resources. As a for-profit company, they need to be sure that everything comes in on time and on budget. That can only result in one thing: the most important security holes being plugged and the others either put off to a later date or not dealt with at all.
I think it should be obvious that Windows ranks lower in security when the Service Packs alone are the size of most Linux distributions.
SevenL Networks Inc.
Linux Dedicated Hosting, Virtual Private Servers and Managed Services
http://www.sevenl.net
Linux Dedicated Hosting, Virtual Private Servers and Managed Services
http://www.sevenl.net
linux will eventually need an anti-virus program hopefully after my time
current personal projects The H8ers Club
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Hi,
please could be one off you be so kind to tell me if is there a software for suse 11.1 to exploit loopholes?.
Thank you be so kind to help me.
Michael
Much of the software used to exploit (Windows) loopholes are linux-based.
Sadly you need a brain (and knowledge) to utilise it.
Sorry to disappoint you.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- New Anti Virus ? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Which Anti-virus to choose (*nix Software)
- Firewall and Anti virus (Mac Software)
- Symantec auto anti-virus updates (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- Suspected virus issue (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- free anti virus programmes for XP (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
Other Threads in the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Forum
- Previous Thread: Apache Ant and Java with Fedora
- Next Thread: partitioning space in ubuntu
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
age-related baremetal chrome cio cloudcomputing code commercial computers crystalballsunday desktop developers development distributions distro dsl elderly embedded forums google http://expertcore.org/ innovations jauntyjackalope kernel library linus linux microsoft multi-core netgear newbies openoffice.org operating operatingsystems parallel performance processing redhat routers smp studios system systembuilders systemintegrators terminalservices thecloud thinclients tools ubuntu users virtualization vmware webbased wikis windows xenon






