| | |
EXECryptor software protection
Please support our C advertiser: Programming Forums - DaniWeb Sister Site
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Hi all
I'm looking forward to purchase ExeCryptor (www.strongbit.com) to protect my shareware. But before I'd like to know independent opinions/experience if any.
My question is: Anybody uses execryptor? Can you tell me smth about? Are there some problems? Is it cost-effective?
Thank you in advance for any reply
Jean
I'm looking forward to purchase ExeCryptor (www.strongbit.com) to protect my shareware. But before I'd like to know independent opinions/experience if any.
My question is: Anybody uses execryptor? Can you tell me smth about? Are there some problems? Is it cost-effective?
Thank you in advance for any reply
Jean
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 244
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 5
Er, why would you protect shareware? Nowadays, I thought shareware was pretty extinct.
Back in the days of 14.4, there was a call for shareware since you'd be able to order it from a catalog, but with the connections available today (not to mention piracy), I got the impression that it's all freeware after the first download.
And I can certainly buy that this is an advertisement, unless the poster returns...
Back in the days of 14.4, there was a call for shareware since you'd be able to order it from a catalog, but with the connections available today (not to mention piracy), I got the impression that it's all freeware after the first download.
And I can certainly buy that this is an advertisement, unless the poster returns...
Explainer of control logic and some basics.
"If you seek to drink from a fountain of knowledge, make sure your cup is big enough."
"If you seek to drink from a fountain of knowledge, make sure your cup is big enough."
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Salem
I'm wondering how many boards I'm going to see this spam on....
In fact, it appears in so many places (thanks google) that I regard it as marketing spam to make people click on the link rather than any serious attempt to ask a meaningful question.
•
•
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by BillyColl
You are on the right track. EXECryptor is enough strong protection. it obfuscates app code on the machine commands level. Also one of its main "pros" is that it does not decrypt the code at all. The wrapped app runs in a "garbage" state.
"Cons": icreases app size.
Yeah- it's a typical (and sadly transparent) spammer contrivance:
New Member A posts: "I've heard about this product called XYZ. People have told me it's really great, but I want to get some other opinions before I buy it. Has anyone here used XYZ?"
New Member B chimes in: "Hi- I've been using XYZ for quite some time now, and I can tell you that it really works. I'd recommend it to anyone!"
Now- would it surprise you know that the Daniweb membership database indicates that "Jean5" and "BillyColl" both registered from the same IP address? No... I didn't think you'd be surprised.
I was considering delteing this entire thread on the grounds of it being Spam, but I think I'll just leave it here instead. That way, if people are Googling for "EXECryptor", they can find this thread and come to their own conclusions about the product based on the way it has been *ahem* "marketed" here.
New Member A posts: "I've heard about this product called XYZ. People have told me it's really great, but I want to get some other opinions before I buy it. Has anyone here used XYZ?"
New Member B chimes in: "Hi- I've been using XYZ for quite some time now, and I can tell you that it really works. I'd recommend it to anyone!"
Now- would it surprise you know that the Daniweb membership database indicates that "Jean5" and "BillyColl" both registered from the same IP address? No... I didn't think you'd be surprised.
I was considering delteing this entire thread on the grounds of it being Spam, but I think I'll just leave it here instead. That way, if people are Googling for "EXECryptor", they can find this thread and come to their own conclusions about the product based on the way it has been *ahem* "marketed" here.
Last edited by DMR; Oct 5th, 2006 at 2:24 pm.
"May the Wombat of Happiness snuffle through your underbrush."
- Ancient Aborigine blessing
Please do not contact me by email or PM for help. We're all volunteers here, and only have so much free time to dedicate to our efforts.
However, if I've been working on a thread with you already, and seem to have "forgotten" your thread, please do send me a message. I try not to let things slip through the cracks, but it does happen sometimes.
- Ancient Aborigine blessing
Please do not contact me by email or PM for help. We're all volunteers here, and only have so much free time to dedicate to our efforts.
However, if I've been working on a thread with you already, and seem to have "forgotten" your thread, please do send me a message. I try not to let things slip through the cracks, but it does happen sometimes.
![]() |
Other Threads in the C Forum
- Previous Thread: Can Someone Check This?
- Next Thread: how to test a software program on linux
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for C
#include * append array arrays asterisks binarysearch calculate changingto char character cm command copyimagefile cprogramme creafecopyofanytypeoffileinc database directory dynamic execv feet fgets file fork forloop framework function functions givemetehcodez grade graphics gtkwinlinux hacking histogram homework include incrementoperators input intmain() iso kernel keyboard km lazy license linked linkedlist linux list lists locate logical_drives looping loopinsideloop. lowest matrix microsoft motherboard mqqueue number oddnumber odf opensource overwrite owf pdf performance pointer posix problem probleminc process program programming radix recursion recv recvblocked research reversing scanf scripting segmentationfault sequential socket socketprograming spoonfeeding standard string student systemcall testing threads turboc unix user variable wab whythiscodecausesegmentationfault windowsapi





