Easy Way to Adjust LargeSystemCache

Reply

Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,035
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 128
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is offline Offline
The Queen of DaniWeb

Easy Way to Adjust LargeSystemCache

 
0
  #1
Mar 13th, 2004
I found this in a few different places around the 'net - hopefully it's helpful:

Easy Way to Adjust LargeSystemCache

Normally, the tweak I've seen asks you to go into HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management and change the value to either O or 1 to the adjustment the LargeSystemCache.

However, in Windows XP, all you have to do is:
  • Right-click My Computer.
  • Select Properties.
  • Click Advanced.
  • Choose Performance.
  • Click Advanced again.
  • Select either Programs or System Cache under Memory Usage.
    Programs = 0 for the registry tweak equivalent
    System Cache = 1 for the registry tweak equivalent
  • On NT Server (in this case XP), the Large System Cache option is enabled, but disabled on Workstation. The two different settings effect how the cache manager allocates free memory. If the Large Cache option is on, the manager marks all the free memory, which isn't being used by the system and/or applications, as freely available for disk caching.
  • On the flip-side (with a small cache), the manager instead only sets aside 4MB of memory for disk caching in an attempt to accelerate the launch of applications. Or in a more technical approach, if enabled the system will favor system-cache working sets over process working sets (with a working set basically being the memory used by components of a process).
Last edited by cscgal; Jun 11th, 2004 at 5:00 pm.
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:


Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC