| | |
myth or truth?
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Microsoft Hidden Files
Is this just speculation or is there any real prove that they operate like this?
It's all speculation.
Do the hidden files and folders mentioned in the article exist?
Absolutely, although many of them aren't nearly as "invisible" in Win 2K or XP as they are in Win 9x (the article targets Win 9x specifically in terms of file/folder names and locations).
Did MS "hide" files and folders for nefarious reasons?
I'm not even going to touch that one. I may make jokes about The Great Satan and The Beast of Redmond, but I'll bet lazy/sloppy coding practices are as much the root of the issue as anything else.
In addition, Microsoft is by no means the only "guilty" party in this regard- I can give you the names of dozens of obscure Netscape, Mozilla, Apple, Linux/UNIX, etc. files which store exactly the same types of private (and possibly embarrassing) user data that the article's author is concerned about.
The upshot is this: The raw facts presented in the article concerning the invisibility of certain Windows files/folders are essentially true, but the paranoid, conspiratorial wordcrafting used by the author gives the whole thing a *cough* rather biased tone.
Do the hidden files and folders mentioned in the article exist?
Absolutely, although many of them aren't nearly as "invisible" in Win 2K or XP as they are in Win 9x (the article targets Win 9x specifically in terms of file/folder names and locations).
Did MS "hide" files and folders for nefarious reasons?
I'm not even going to touch that one. I may make jokes about The Great Satan and The Beast of Redmond, but I'll bet lazy/sloppy coding practices are as much the root of the issue as anything else.
In addition, Microsoft is by no means the only "guilty" party in this regard- I can give you the names of dozens of obscure Netscape, Mozilla, Apple, Linux/UNIX, etc. files which store exactly the same types of private (and possibly embarrassing) user data that the article's author is concerned about.
The upshot is this: The raw facts presented in the article concerning the invisibility of certain Windows files/folders are essentially true, but the paranoid, conspiratorial wordcrafting used by the author gives the whole thing a *cough* rather biased tone.
"May the Wombat of Happiness snuffle through your underbrush."
- Ancient Aborigine blessing
Please do not contact me by email or PM for help. We're all volunteers here, and only have so much free time to dedicate to our efforts.
However, if I've been working on a thread with you already, and seem to have "forgotten" your thread, please do send me a message. I try not to let things slip through the cracks, but it does happen sometimes.
- Ancient Aborigine blessing
Please do not contact me by email or PM for help. We're all volunteers here, and only have so much free time to dedicate to our efforts.
However, if I've been working on a thread with you already, and seem to have "forgotten" your thread, please do send me a message. I try not to let things slip through the cracks, but it does happen sometimes.
Some is true. The part of Internet explorer not deleting your net activity (Index.dat in Temporarly Internet Files Folder). Tweakwindows deletes them if you set it to. Part about not being able to see some files in MS-DOS mode - balls! There is no file invisible in the DOS mode (unless the path is 60-character or longer), but you can see all files in the windows too (95/98) if you approach it the right way (Temporary Internet Files is the dodgy folder to see)
And part of RELLY HIDDEN STUFF -B A L L S !
c:windows empor~1
c:windowshistory
I did many inspections on my HD's.
I did manual FAT restoring, even written a program that restores files on formated disk by directly accessing drive and reading sector by sector trying to find certain file header and directly wiriting a position of the file in the FAT and writing the file in the root folder. So you can say that I KNOW what was on my disc. (Windows 98SE)
The stuff he refers to are DELETED temporary files that are used during installation. That's all.
And part of RELLY HIDDEN STUFF -B A L L S !
c:windows empor~1
c:windowshistory
I did many inspections on my HD's.
I did manual FAT restoring, even written a program that restores files on formated disk by directly accessing drive and reading sector by sector trying to find certain file header and directly wiriting a position of the file in the FAT and writing the file in the root folder. So you can say that I KNOW what was on my disc. (Windows 98SE)
The stuff he refers to are DELETED temporary files that are used during installation. That's all.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Can I ghost a RAID array??? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Truth Table (Computer Science)
- Firefox Myths (Web Browsers)
Other Threads in the Windows Software Forum
- Previous Thread: Outlook: my reply address keeps corrupting
- Next Thread: Need help with Media Player
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
2.0 acquisition acquisitions android applications apps asp backup bailout ballmer beta billgates blackberry blue bostock browser business cisco creativesuite4 development download ebay economy email excel exchange facebook framework freesoftware gaming ghost google halo htc ibm icahn ie8 intel internet jobs law layoffs linux merger microsoft microsoftoffice microsoftsurface mobile net news nintendo novell office officefileformats officesuites onlinetimetracking openoffice opensource opensuse os outlook patent pfizer piracy protocols redhat registry rhce rim security server sex siliconvalley software softwaretest sony standards survey takeover timetracking training venturecapitalists virtualapplication virtualization vista vmware web wii windows windows7 windowslive wordpress xbox xbox360 xolaptop yahoo yahoo! yang zephyr2 zoho






