| | |
XP Pro vs X64
![]() |
x64 is okay, if you dont mind the lack of drivers for some devices like my HP Deskjet 3325 printer. Interms of performance, I'd say an 8% boost in the feel of the OS, a better implementation of the TCP/IP stack. The look is the same as WinXP. Also, older 16 bit apps will just not run on x64. However, 32 bit apps worked just fine for me.
Touch eyeballs to screen for cheap laser surgery
x64 does run faster on my new system than the 32bit version. I'm not running the beta, either. But, I have run into the same issues of lack of drivers.
All in all, you'll be able to run the 32 bit stuff you want to, but it won't be any faster than it would have been in Windows 32-bit.
All in all, you'll be able to run the 32 bit stuff you want to, but it won't be any faster than it would have been in Windows 32-bit.
Alex Cavnar, aka alc6379
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Windows XP X64 rund definately faster! And especially on AMD 32bit prgs aren't slower. The driver support improves steadly and thanks to Application compatibility patches Microsofot released for XP X64, all my prgs work except of course the OS close prgs like firewall or virus scanner, but for virus protection I use Avast Free and for firewall I use the NVidia Network Access Manager which enables the nforce enabled hardware firewall.
if you are wanting to run 64bit progs, obviously yea, butt they dont make to mutch right now, and you are practically not going to care to mutch for it right now, but yea if you had x64 edition and you had to chouse between a 32 or 64 bit prog, the you would definetly notice the difference in the 64 over the 32bit version.
Yo ancient dragon, If you want a trial version of it, which i would reccomend so you dont have to pay for something you might not like go here http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/6...cts/trial.mspx
If you want to go for it than go here http://www.nextag.com/windows-xp-pro...on/search-html
If you want to go for it than go here http://www.nextag.com/windows-xp-pro...on/search-html
MARTINEX();
hey ive got win 64-bit installed right now.
It is pretty similar tio windows 2003 server edition.
the only downside to it is that u cant emulate all 32 progs, as u could with 32-bit operating systems.
currently there are no image backup progs that will run on it.
especially norton ghost.
It is pretty similar tio windows 2003 server edition.
the only downside to it is that u cant emulate all 32 progs, as u could with 32-bit operating systems.
currently there are no image backup progs that will run on it.
especially norton ghost.
MARTINEX();
![]() |
Similar Threads
- User Accounts in XP Pro x64 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Help! No post, beeps or screen (Troubleshooting Dead Machines)
- Dual Channel ECC/R question (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Any advice about folder size viewer (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
Other Threads in the Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum
- Previous Thread: Header Checksum Error
- Next Thread: Probably a stupid question but...
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
.net 3.5 3daccelertion 2007 2010 a.exe alaris apache appstore arm auto automatically black blue book boot cellphones collaboration computer computerfreezes crash cursor deployment desktop desktops dns dotnetnuke drive eartlink error errors explorer features folder fontmanagers format framework gadgets install intel internet interoperability killprocess laptop latitude linux load login mac microsoft mobile monitor motionle1600 netbooks novell nvidia open operatingsystems osx palm partition patch port printer product proxy rds remotedesktop remotedesktopconnection repair replacingraiddrive retrieve screen simplifiedchinese sp1 ubuntu unreadable update usb verizon videodrivers videogames virtual virus vista visual vulnerability wab webos weecam win win32/heur window windows windows7 windowsxp windowsxpnotstartingup. worm xp xpde






