agreed

There is also that rare possiblity that you mix assembly and C++ to design assembled modules that can work with the C++ by working the code to use those modules. But for that you have to have a very good idea of what your doing and when you really need to do it. You can always custom-taylor an open-source project or combo.

Modern kids, thinking C++ is old-school...
In my youth we thought C was too modern, it would never take off :mrgreen:

rofl

i disklike c++ myself, but i appreciate its importance

they should make a better c++ and call it D that would be cool

(and yes ive tried c# and c++.net and dislike them also)

They'd have to call it E or something else because there already is a D language.

it is?

Yup -- here

>they should make a better c++ and call it D that would be cool
That was basically the whole goal of D -- to improve on C++'s strengths, and remove the bad parts, as was Java's goal, Objective-C's goal (well actually it was more based on C, but nevertheless it used C++ concepts), C#'s...

The most confusing part of D is that it's perfectly fine to use void main -- now that would just confuse all us C++ programmers!

wait, is void main bad?

Sigh...