•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Geeks' Lounge section within the Coffee House category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 391,550 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,583 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Geeks' Lounge advertiser:
Views: 2147 | Replies: 18
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 2,892
Reputation:
Rep Power: 8
Solved Threads: 7
More a bug fixing exercise than a full point release, in terms of added functionlity and features, in my never humble opinion. I have been calling it Firefox 1.6 around here.
Not that it sucks, just that it sucks they haven't done more to justify the 2.0 release.
The real irony is, on the feature front, that they seem to have been playing catch up with IE7 this time instead of the other way around (anti-phishing tools and browser session saving) which could point to Microsoft getting back some development momentum here.
Not that it sucks, just that it sucks they haven't done more to justify the 2.0 release.
The real irony is, on the feature front, that they seem to have been playing catch up with IE7 this time instead of the other way around (anti-phishing tools and browser session saving) which could point to Microsoft getting back some development momentum here.
Davey Winder
Information Security Journalist of the Year (2008)
www.happygeek.com
Author: Being Virtual
Information Security Journalist of the Year (2008)
www.happygeek.com
Author: Being Virtual
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,646
Reputation:
Rep Power: 18
Solved Threads: 191
42 Private messages asking for help will be ignored
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Steve's iMinstrels, and there was much rejoicing.
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Steve's iMinstrels, and there was much rejoicing.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 2,892
Reputation:
Rep Power: 8
Solved Threads: 7
Firefox 2: The Clint Eastwood of browser clients.
Opens up all sorts of possible marketing opportunites
"Do you feel lucky Microsoft? Well, do you?"
Opens up all sorts of possible marketing opportunites

"Do you feel lucky Microsoft? Well, do you?"
Davey Winder
Information Security Journalist of the Year (2008)
www.happygeek.com
Author: Being Virtual
Information Security Journalist of the Year (2008)
www.happygeek.com
Author: Being Virtual
•
•
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: near St Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 10,541
Reputation:
Rep Power: 36
Solved Threads: 860
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 2,892
Reputation:
Rep Power: 8
Solved Threads: 7
In fairness, tabbed browsing was hardly a Firefox innovation in the first place. I think the first to adopt a true Multiple Document Interface approach was NetCaptor which wrapped around the IE rendering engine and was first released back in 1999. Opera also got there before Firefox if my memory serves me correctly.
Davey Winder
Information Security Journalist of the Year (2008)
www.happygeek.com
Author: Being Virtual
Information Security Journalist of the Year (2008)
www.happygeek.com
Author: Being Virtual
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The backwoods of the U.S.
Posts: 91
Reputation:
Rep Power: 4
Solved Threads: 1
I've been using Firefox for quite some time now. I based my decision to use Firefox on stability, security, and usability (tabbed browsing). Firefox has in the past and continues to own other popular browsers in security and usability. My only complaint is that very little happened in the upgrade to 2.0. This makes me wonder if Firefox went 2.0 just to get publicity.
Please, feel free to disagree with my decision. My browser works best for me, you use the browser that best works for you.
Please, feel free to disagree with my decision. My browser works best for me, you use the browser that best works for you.
A stone is heavy and sand is weighty,
But a fool’s wrath is heavier than both of them.
- Proverbs 27:3
But a fool’s wrath is heavier than both of them.
- Proverbs 27:3
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,646
Reputation:
Rep Power: 18
Solved Threads: 191
Correct Davey, Opera's had it for years and I saw something like what you describe I think back in 1997 for the first time (a wrapper around the IE engine).
And even that might not have been new. After all, old Unix browsers were based around Emacs and VI both of which allow multiple simultaneously loaded documents...
And even that might not have been new. After all, old Unix browsers were based around Emacs and VI both of which allow multiple simultaneously loaded documents...
42 Private messages asking for help will be ignored
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Steve's iMinstrels, and there was much rejoicing.
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Steve's iMinstrels, and there was much rejoicing.
Yeah not much difference really. I've been using the portable version of RC1 (can get it here) for a few days now. I think it is an improvement, especially with the spell checking, and the ability to load the same content you had open when you last exited. Could have done more though...
![]() |
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Geeks' Lounge Marketplace
•
•
•
•
beta bon browser browsers browsing development echo email encryption europe firefox gecko html internet internet explorer internet explorer 7 javascript leak linux memory microsoft mozilla networking news open source open-source patch phishing scams security social software super testing users web webmail
- Previous Thread: Cedar Point in Ohio announces new roller coaster
- Next Thread: what to do with all my extra webhosting service?



Linear Mode