| | |
PHP or ASP
Please support our Search Engine Optimization advertiser: Get a Free SEO Analysis!
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I know that there is probably no definitive answer, but
does it matter in search engine optimization whether you use PHP or ASP for your CMS.
Look forward to hearing your ideas.
does it matter in search engine optimization whether you use PHP or ASP for your CMS.
Look forward to hearing your ideas.
There is no difference at all. Search engines don't care what server-side language you use. They only see the HTML they produce.
John Conde
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
•
•
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,655
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 35
There is an absolutely definitive answer: search engines see pages. Search engines do not see the code that produces pages.
I remember the day when "web developers" first concerned themselves about oh, performance, database connectivity, effeciency, code reuse... now we worry about search engine "optimization" before even learning the most fundamental first principles of web development, such as the difference between "client" and "server".
This is sad.
I remember the day when "web developers" first concerned themselves about oh, performance, database connectivity, effeciency, code reuse... now we worry about search engine "optimization" before even learning the most fundamental first principles of web development, such as the difference between "client" and "server".
This is sad.
•
•
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 44
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 3
Slightly OT, one thing you might consider is that search engines don't tend to carry results like http://www.example.com/products.php?category=5&id=6. Instead, you might want to use something like mod_rewrite (if you use Apache) and have your links point to http://www.example.com/products/5/6 instead, and have mod_rewrite re-write it to the original URL. That's a negative effect of these scripting languages. Back to the original question, it then doesn't matter what language you use, as the search engine won't even know you're using php (well, they can find out under normal config, but you can disable things like that too (php.ini expose_php setting)).
I disagree! Nearly all bots can follow paramaterized links just fine. However, they are aware that they are dynamic URLs and are often much more reluctant to include them. MCP was right in stating that "search engines don't tend to carry results like" ... he said nothing about having a problem following them.
Last edited by cscgal; Oct 4th, 2006 at 3:59 am.
Search engines will index any page that has a query string with the she same results as a page without a query string. The only time a query string will cause SEO issues is if it contains a session ID or id= in the query string (because that can be perceived as a session ID). Otherwise there is no difference between the two as far as getting pages indexed.
John Conde
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
•
•
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 44
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 3
tgreer, it depends on the URL, specifically the types and number of parameters present. stymiee is more correct in this regard. There's a video by Matt Cutts (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Cutts for more on who he is) on how Google pageranks dynamic URLs vs static URLs. You can view this here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...20126300142609
Of course, this is only talks about how Google treats these, and other search engines may use different logic.
My original point was more along the lines that mod_rewrite can help eliminate any bias search engine logic may weigh against dynamic URLs. I can't see how it can hurt anyhow.
(And, for the record, I found this video with that URL through Google and it was the #1 hit.)
Of course, this is only talks about how Google treats these, and other search engines may use different logic.
My original point was more along the lines that mod_rewrite can help eliminate any bias search engine logic may weigh against dynamic URLs. I can't see how it can hurt anyhow.
(And, for the record, I found this video with that URL through Google and it was the #1 hit.)
![]() |
Similar Threads
- PHP vs ASP... the big ShOwdOwN (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- PHP vs. ASP.NET for development platforms (ASP.NET)
- PHP vs. ASP.NET for development platforms (PHP)
- PHP, ASP, ColdFusion, what's your fav? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- PHP vs ASP (Oracle Article) (IT Professionals' Lounge)
Other Threads in the Search Engine Optimization Forum
- Previous Thread: Google page Rate
- Next Thread: Dmoz
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
advertising affordable airplane alexa analytics apple archive audioanalytics backlinks bing biometrics blog blogs bomb business cashback chrome codesearch company consumer design development digital directory engine england enterprisesearch eric_schmidt estate facebook google googlelongersearchbox googlesearch googlesitesearch googletrends hacking imagerecognition imagesearch indexedpage india internetmarketingcompanyindia jcpenney keyword keywords kumar marketing microsoft monetization news no-follow offshoreoutsourcingcompany opensource optimization optimizingforbing organic pagerank plug-ins posts powerset ppc propertly ranking refresh rss search searchengine searchengineland searchengineoptimization searchengines seinfeld semanticweb seo seocompany seooptimizationindia seoservices serps sex socialnetworking space spam stalking testing tools tveyes tweetnews twitter uk usenet video videosearch viralmarketing wave web website wolfram wolframalpha wordpress yahoo yahoo! youtube







