| | |
OOSE Vs. Structured SE
Thread Solved |
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 26
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
We might think this would be easy to answer. We might be wrong.
First, we have to look at what Structured and Object Oriented mean.
Object Oriented (from WikiPedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_oriented) is:
Structured Programming is a subset of Procedural Programming (Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_programming). An example is this:
Sounds similar, doesn't it? It is. The major difference is in the language you choose and how you implement these 'things' within the language or framwork. Some languages and frameworks (like .net) are strongly typed Object Oriented languages. EVERYTHING is an object. While a few built-in methods could qualify as procedural, and we often write subroutines that would be indistinguishable from a similar method in a non-OO language, nonetheless in an OO environment we always deal with objects.
Some languages like ADA, C, PL/1, etc, are classical structured languages. Frameworks like dotNet are close to 100% OO.
Which is better? Your call. Depends on what you're planning to do for a living, and which suits you better. You will find strong proponents of both from various fields. Whatever works for you is where you need to be.
Me, I prefer OO. I've done a fair amount of Procedural and Structured as well, but OO seems to make more sense in my daily work.
Hope that helps!
Ned
First, we have to look at what Structured and Object Oriented mean.
Object Oriented (from WikiPedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_oriented) is:
•
•
•
•
(an) Object-oriented system is composed of objects. The behaviour of the system is achieved through collaboration between these objects, and the state of the system is the combined state of all the objects in it. Collaboration between objects involves them sending messages to each other. The exact semantics of message sends between objects varies depending on what kind of system is being modelled. In some systems, "sending a message" is the same as "invoking a method".
•
•
•
•
Coders should break larger pieces of code into shorter subroutines (functions, procedures. methods, blocks, or otherwise) that are small enough to be understood easily. In general, programs should use global variables sparingly; instead, subroutines should use local variables and take arguments by either value or reference.
Some languages like ADA, C, PL/1, etc, are classical structured languages. Frameworks like dotNet are close to 100% OO.
Which is better? Your call. Depends on what you're planning to do for a living, and which suits you better. You will find strong proponents of both from various fields. Whatever works for you is where you need to be.
Me, I prefer OO. I've done a fair amount of Procedural and Structured as well, but OO seems to make more sense in my daily work.
Hope that helps!
Ned
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 54
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Thankx
For your Enthusiasm to help me
Regards,
Ben.
For your Enthusiasm to help me
Regards,
Ben.
•
•
•
•
We might think this would be easy to answer. We might be wrong.
First, we have to look at what Structured and Object Oriented mean.
Object Oriented (from WikiPedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_oriented) is:
Structured Programming is a subset of Procedural Programming (Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_programming). An example is this:
Sounds similar, doesn't it? It is. The major difference is in the language you choose and how you implement these 'things' within the language or framwork. Some languages and frameworks (like .net) are strongly typed Object Oriented languages. EVERYTHING is an object. While a few built-in methods could qualify as procedural, and we often write subroutines that would be indistinguishable from a similar method in a non-OO language, nonetheless in an OO environment we always deal with objects.
Some languages like ADA, C, PL/1, etc, are classical structured languages. Frameworks like dotNet are close to 100% OO.
Which is better? Your call. Depends on what you're planning to do for a living, and which suits you better. You will find strong proponents of both from various fields. Whatever works for you is where you need to be.
Me, I prefer OO. I've done a fair amount of Procedural and Structured as well, but OO seems to make more sense in my daily work.
Hope that helps!
Ned
![]() |
Similar Threads
- structured COBOL program (VB.NET)
- Structured Program Design (Computer Science)
- Ever Notice this? (*nix Software)
- Completely new to C++ and have question about using char (C++)
- How to exit without exit? (C++)
- Does XHTML have a future? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
Other Threads in the IT Professionals' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: ipod & sony k8001 questions
- Next Thread: How To Stop "save As", Need help from copying all my stuff
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
1gbit advertising advice amazon answers archive british broadband business businessprocesses career carrier censorship cern china cio collectiveintelligence connectivity consumer consumers corporateearnings datatransfer debtcollectors dictionary digg digital ebay ecommerce email employment environment facebook food government grid high-definition hottub infodelivery infotech intel internet interview ipod isp japan kindle lhc library malware marketing mit moonfruit news onlineshopping piracy piratebay pope porn program questions r&d religion remoteworking research retail security sex shopping simple skype smallbusiness smb sms socialmedia socialnetworking software softwareengineer spam speed spending startrek statistics stocks study stumbleupon survey tabletpc technology touch-screen touchscreen twitter uk videoinprint voips web webdeveloper windows words





