| | |
Installing Microsoft Vista
![]() |
•
•
•
•
used Mozbackup to import my settings from the XP install
A patched up version of ultimate Sp1 with all the additions like IIS adds up to 19.2gb, just enough so windows wont complain about swapfiles
Last edited by jbennet; May 7th, 2008 at 6:38 pm.
If i am helpful, please give me reputation points.
but strip it down to the basics and cut that number in half!!
Use all suggestions at your own risk, but if I helped you, please give me reputation points. I will do the same from now on. Also, follow me on twitter at: http://www.twitter.com/forumdude1024
"If all else fails, reinstall windows"
"If all else fails, reinstall windows"
the other 15+ gb goes to the $#** microsoft puts in their products. probably a time bomb to destroy you files after a couple of years!! LOL!!!
Use all suggestions at your own risk, but if I helped you, please give me reputation points. I will do the same from now on. Also, follow me on twitter at: http://www.twitter.com/forumdude1024
"If all else fails, reinstall windows"
"If all else fails, reinstall windows"
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I really want to try windows vista but i got a problem with it.. I can't run my software that i am using in my work.. so this is what really bothers me..
dual boot vista and xp
Use all suggestions at your own risk, but if I helped you, please give me reputation points. I will do the same from now on. Also, follow me on twitter at: http://www.twitter.com/forumdude1024
"If all else fails, reinstall windows"
"If all else fails, reinstall windows"
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 52
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 3
Thank you. Just wish I had read that beforehand. I had problems with installing it at first but all ok now.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
id say 60gb
vista + office + drivers + updates comes to like 35+ gb
My system is fully functional at 25 Gb but I have to admit that I had to resize the partition size from an orginal 20Gb because after SP1 Vista just got fatter.
I'm not against the arguement that Vista is bloated, but that's what you get for loading up all the supposed features of Vista even though you only have a license for, say Business or Home. Besides, Mac is generally designed for reliability and scurity not flexibility and compatibility. However, in terms of security... I think the tables have turned for Mac and Vista. google pwn2own
)Has anyone tried installing any Mac OS on any other machine other than what it was built for? (not an arguement but a real question)
![]() |
Other Threads in the Windows Vista and Windows 7 Forum
- Previous Thread: Please Help - I have had enough!
- Next Thread: Downgrade from Vista to XP
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
.net 7 32bit access acquisitions advertising android apple awards azure ballmer beta billgates blackberry blog centro cloudcomputing code computer computing desktop development downloads drm economy error freeze freezes.hangs gartner google hp ie8 intel internetexplorer ip iphone itunes killswitch licenses licensing linux mac merger microsoft midori mobile mode mojave monopolies nap newbie news operating operatingsystem operatingsystems opinion os osx patch patents pc pirate printdirectorylisting research russia security seinfeld server smcwpci-n software sp1 sp2 sp3 spyware steve steveballmer survey system time touchscreen ubuntu unix upgrade virtual virtualization virus vista volume win7 windows windows7 windowsmobile windowsserver windowsvista windowsxp wpa2 wpf xenocode xp yahoo





