| | |
computer will not recognize new slave drive
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I have two HP computers that have trojans that I can not get rid of so I backed up everything to computer 2 and then purchased a new Maxtor 6Y120PO drive and installed it on computer 2 with all the information I wanted to save. The instructions did fine and I was able to backup all the information from computer 2 to the new hard drive... then I formated computer 1 and transfered the new hard drive (with the information) to computer 1 but computer 1 will not recognize the new drive. Computer 1 recognizes the hard drive in the bios but I get no drive letter. When I use the MaxBlast 3 software to try to install the new drive in computer 1 it wants to format it first saying there is existing information on it and will be lost... I need to be able to transfer the information from the new hard drive to computer 1...the MaxBlast 3 program says it installed Dynamic Drive Overlay v9.84 on computer 2 but I can't get it to install the DDO on computer 1 without it first wanting to format the drive first... It has the information on it so I do not want it formated ofcourse...HELP please.
Last edited by mann114; Jun 3rd, 2004 at 8:01 pm. Reason: to make it clearer to understand
So, in Windows, computer #1 doesn't see the drive, correct?
You need to browse to Computer Management by right-clicking "My Computer" on your desktop, then clicking "Manage."
From there, you should see the disk in the right-hand pane. You may be able to right-click it and choose "Change drive letter and paths," or you may have to click on the window menu..."Action," then "Rescan disks" to even get the disk to show in the right-hand pane.
Oh, and what does Butlerville mean to you?
You need to browse to Computer Management by right-clicking "My Computer" on your desktop, then clicking "Manage."
From there, you should see the disk in the right-hand pane. You may be able to right-click it and choose "Change drive letter and paths," or you may have to click on the window menu..."Action," then "Rescan disks" to even get the disk to show in the right-hand pane.
Oh, and what does Butlerville mean to you?
Champagne ambition on a beer budget.
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by feigned
So, in Windows, computer #1 doesn't see the drive, correct?
You need to browse to Computer Management by right-clicking "My Computer" on your desktop, then clicking "Manage."
From there, you should see the disk in the right-hand pane. You may be able to right-click it and choose "Change drive letter and paths," or you may have to click on the window menu..."Action," then "Rescan disks" to even get the disk to show in the right-hand pane.
Oh, and what does Butlerville mean to you?
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
'Computer management' isn't a feature of the earlier Windows OS's
Are you making sure you are changing the drive id 'jumpers', and using the correct cable connectors, when you're moving these drives from system to system? If you are simply unplgging them from one machine, and plugging them into another, switching from 'Master' to 'slave' position as you go, then that won't work.
You need to corrctly configure each drive for the position it's being moved to.
Are you making sure you are changing the drive id 'jumpers', and using the correct cable connectors, when you're moving these drives from system to system? If you are simply unplgging them from one machine, and plugging them into another, switching from 'Master' to 'slave' position as you go, then that won't work.
You need to corrctly configure each drive for the position it's being moved to.
Yes, definitely make sure the master/slave jumpers on the drive are set correctly for the drive's location on the new computer's IDE chain.
If the jumpers are set correctly, open a DOS box and see what the "fdisk" has to report about the drive.
If the jumpers are set correctly, open a DOS box and see what the "fdisk" has to report about the drive.
"May the Wombat of Happiness snuffle through your underbrush."
- Ancient Aborigine blessing
Please do not contact me by email or PM for help. We're all volunteers here, and only have so much free time to dedicate to our efforts.
However, if I've been working on a thread with you already, and seem to have "forgotten" your thread, please do send me a message. I try not to let things slip through the cracks, but it does happen sometimes.
- Ancient Aborigine blessing
Please do not contact me by email or PM for help. We're all volunteers here, and only have so much free time to dedicate to our efforts.
However, if I've been working on a thread with you already, and seem to have "forgotten" your thread, please do send me a message. I try not to let things slip through the cracks, but it does happen sometimes.
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by DMR
Yes, definitely make sure the master/slave jumpers on the drive are set correctly for the drive's location on the new computer's IDE chain.
If the jumpers are set correctly, open a DOS box and see what the "fdisk" has to report about the drive.
Also go into the BIOS on reboot to make sure that you can see both drives.
however note that all your drives will be running at the speed of the slowest drive on the cable... i.e. asuming your computer supports udma100, your udma100 hard drive would run at udma33 with a modern cd drive on the same cable.
I'd agree it definitely sounds like your jumpers are wrong.
I'd agree it definitely sounds like your jumpers are wrong.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
DaveSW, that's not correct. Drives being limited to the speed of the slowest unit on the cable is only something that related to quite old systems. Most modern systems can run the drives at their correct speed, and that has been the case for some years now!
The feature is called "Independent Device Timing", and is so much a standard now that you don't see it even get a mention
The feature is called "Independent Device Timing", and is so much a standard now that you don't see it even get a mention
really? I've always found drives run faster when configured this way... in fact, quite a few seconds difference on boot times.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- computer will not recognize sole hard drive (Storage)
- Computer will not recognize new slave drive (Storage)
Other Threads in the Storage Forum
- Previous Thread: Toshiba 4030CDT installing DVD-ROM
- Next Thread: How can you tell how fast a hard drive can write and read?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
acronis archivevault atmail backup backupandrecoverystrategy blinkingcursor boot data databasededuplication datadeduplicationsoftware datarecovery datastorage deduping deduplicating deduplication deduplicationalgorithm deduplicationsoftware deduplicationsystems deduplicationtechnology disasterrecovery disasterrecoverydatabase disc-drive discdrives drive emailappliance emailarchive emailstorage failure filters gmail hard hitachi mail maxtor news nobelprize norton offsitestorage partition power recovery restoreserverdatabase serverdatarecovery serverdisasterrecovery serverrecoverysoftware storage terabyte undelete upper windowsserverrestore






