| | |
Assembly is used for?
![]() |
•
•
•
•
I've been searching around the site, looking at the different types of coding, and come accross Assembly. This is one of the most complicating code ive seen yet and was just wondering what is it's most common use?
It is very fast but very complex (therefore generally takes longer to write) and these days tends to be used where massive optimisation is required (a number-crunching algorithm) or in drivers and stuff where it has to interact directly with hardware.
Note to self... pocket cup
•
•
•
•
Assembly language is a very low level language.
It is very fast but very complex (therefore generally takes longer to write) and these days tends to be used where massive optimisation is required (a number-crunching algorithm) or in drivers and stuff where it has to interact directly with hardware.
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
This is completely wrong! Assembly language is very easy
and can be used to develop any kind of application. Have a look at this article and visit the WinAsm Studio site for a lot of free open source tools written in Assembly.
Regards,
Antonis Kyprianou
and can be used to develop any kind of application. Have a look at this article and visit the WinAsm Studio site for a lot of free open source tools written in Assembly.Regards,
Antonis Kyprianou
Last edited by akyprian; Jan 30th, 2007 at 4:08 am.
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Assembly Language can produce small and very fast applications, no bloat, no dependencies (huge dll's), VERY easy to develop and above all, I can do anything I want without facing any HLL limitations.
Microsoft Macro Assembler (MASM), for example, looks VERY similar to C code and is no harder to learn. I would say that it is easier.
Regards,
Antonis
Microsoft Macro Assembler (MASM), for example, looks VERY similar to C code and is no harder to learn. I would say that it is easier.
Regards,
Antonis
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 134
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 3
•
•
•
•
Assembly Language can produce small and very fast applications, no bloat, no dependencies (huge dll's), VERY easy to develop and above all, I can do anything I want without facing any HLL limitations.
Microsoft Macro Assembler (MASM), for example, looks VERY similar to C code and is no harder to learn. I would say that it is easier.
Regards,
Antonis
There is nothing wrong with the speed of today's optimising compilers. Entire operating systems are written in C, including both Windows and Linux - 95% of the source code anyway. What are the HLL limitations nowadays? Operating system API's are written with C in mind, and directly programming the hardware is out of the question in multi-tasking environments such as Windows and Linux.
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
There is nothing wrong with the speed of today's optimising compilers.
•
•
•
•
Entire operating systems are written in C, including both Windows and Linux - 95% of the source code anyway.
•
•
•
•
What are the HLL limitations nowadays?
•
•
•
•
Operating system API's are written with C in mind
•
•
•
•
and directly programming the hardware is out of the question in multi-tasking environments such as Windows and Linux.
Regards,
Antonis
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Questions about assembly and boolean algebra (Assembly)
- Assembly Programming Question (Assembly)
- How can i use inline assembly in VC++ editor (C++)
- Mips Assembly porting from C (Assembly)
- machine/assembly language, syntax error (C++)
- Using x86 Assembly Language with Microsoft Visual C++ (C++)
Other Threads in the Assembly Forum
- Previous Thread: 8 Queens Problem!?
- Next Thread: drag & drop
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |






