| | |
Why Is It Good Not To Be #1?
Please support our Pay-Per-Click Advertising advertiser: Get a Free Web Marketing Analysis!
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I've read here and there that maybe being #1 for a keyword on PPC isn't the best all the time, but I've heard no explaination as to why? Anyone care to share?
Probably because of cost is my guess.
John Conde
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
Suppose there's a very popular keyword and a Google search results in eight sponsored listings being displayed to the right. The very first spot gets the best CTR. However, the very last spot also gets a pretty decent CTR since when people skim, they often read the first and read the last and miss the middle. Therefore, spot #8 might be just a tad bit lower CTR than spot #1 but a whole lot cheaper.
Dani the Computer Science Gal 
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/DaniWeb
And if you're interested in Internet marketing there is twitter.com/DaniWebAds

Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/DaniWeb
And if you're interested in Internet marketing there is twitter.com/DaniWebAds
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 20
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
If you have a bunch of money and the CTR pays more than the cost of the CPC then I would not worry about it. if it is the otherway aroung you might want to be more targeted in the Keyword or pay less for it.
Actually every study ever done on search results shows that the first position gets by far the most traffic. The difference between #1 and #2 is very big and difference between #2 and #3 is very big.
John Conde
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
Brainyminds | Merchant Account Services | I Love Code
IT'S HERE: Merchant Accounts 101 Everything you need to know about merchant accounts!
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I'd say it's the cost. Especially if your visitors don't buy anything. You still have to pay for every click, right?
And also, maybe because people want alternatives. They don't usually buy what they first see. They'll want comparisons. And if they find that number 2 or three is just as good, then they'll stick with the latter, to save time and all.
And also, maybe because people want alternatives. They don't usually buy what they first see. They'll want comparisons. And if they find that number 2 or three is just as good, then they'll stick with the latter, to save time and all.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Traffic may be one thing but in the case of paying for clicks wouldn't you be intereste dto know what the conversion rate of these clicks in position one two and three were as well. I think people naturally skip down the page for variety and comparison shopping purposes, although your studies are correct in what they hypothesise.
•
•
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Well, for me, I don't buy the first thing I see. I can understand that position one and two is wonderful and you get hits, but for conversion sake I think it may be better to be a little down the line. The reason why I say this is because people like to shop around. Site #8 might have more detail than site #1 on a product or service and a little more detail on a product would get me to buy what is on the ad at #8 position. Do you know what I'm trying to say?
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Good books on Shell Programming/Perl (Perl)
- Newsletter pop-under / Good or bad idea? (Website Reviews)
- Good Ol' Windoze 9x (Windows 95 / 98 / Me)
- Where can I buy a good computer? (Geeks' Lounge)
- Know of a good program? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- Good Luck! (Geeks' Lounge)
- ThemeXP is back! (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
Other Threads in the Pay-Per-Click Advertising Forum
- Previous Thread: $200 million for Google Digg
- Next Thread: Microsoft cannot match Google leverage
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
acer adobe adsense advertising amazon analytics android aol api apple appstore ballmer bing blogging browser business carlicahn cellphone chrome chromeos cisco cloudcomputing coding congress copyright cuil development doubleclick earnings ebay economy email environment ericschmidt europe facebook firefox gis gmail google googleadwords googleanalytics googleapps googledocs googleearth googlemaps googlevoice government hewlett-packard hp ibm icahn imap intel internet internetsearch iphone java journalism knol linux mapping maps marissamayer marketing microsoft mobile netbook netbooks news newspapers onlineads operatingsystems oracle palm porn ppc privacy publishing research revenue saas search siliconvalley smartphone socialnetwork socialnetworking software streetview twitter uk verizon video web wiki wikipedia windows yahoo yahoo! youtube






