| | |
help by sorting a simply linked list
Thread Solved
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,620
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 50
Hello,
I looked at your code, and it appears to be a bubble-sort. Here is what I would do.
1) Get yourself a nice sheet of paper, and a pencil.
2) Draw out your data structure.
[CODE]
+-------+ +------------------+ +------------------+
| head | | data | point | | data | point |
+-------+ +------------------+ +------------------+
[\CODE]
Remember to draw little boxes for the temp pointers and stuff too.
3) Go through your code by hand, and fill in the paper as the computer would during the iterations. Do not assume when doing this by hand. Go through the motions, and stick with it. You will find your error.
4) In my coding days, I was always sure to make a duplicate head pointer, just in case I messed up the transition somewhere. Guess it was mild parinoia.
Christian
I looked at your code, and it appears to be a bubble-sort. Here is what I would do.
1) Get yourself a nice sheet of paper, and a pencil.
2) Draw out your data structure.
[CODE]
+-------+ +------------------+ +------------------+
| head | | data | point | | data | point |
+-------+ +------------------+ +------------------+
[\CODE]
Remember to draw little boxes for the temp pointers and stuff too.
3) Go through your code by hand, and fill in the paper as the computer would during the iterations. Do not assume when doing this by hand. Go through the motions, and stick with it. You will find your error.
4) In my coding days, I was always sure to make a duplicate head pointer, just in case I messed up the transition somewhere. Guess it was mild parinoia.
Christian
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
Hello my brother
there is two way to sort a single linked list
First , swapping data but it is unsufficient (( suppose the data is very bug))
Second, swapping pointer is better but it's harder
here you are the two ways
Swapping the pointers
Swapping Data
there is two way to sort a single linked list
First , swapping data but it is unsufficient (( suppose the data is very bug))
Second, swapping pointer is better but it's harder
here you are the two ways
Swapping the pointers
C Syntax (Toggle Plain Text)
void Sortable_List::sort() { Node *ptr1,*ptr2,*temp,*Imithead1,*Imithead2,*before; if (head != NULL) { ptr2 = head; ptr1 = head->next; //First Step Set the smallest value to head while(ptr1 != NULL ) { if (ptr2->data > ptr1->data ) { temp = ptr2; while(temp->next != ptr1) temp = temp->next; temp->next = ptr1->next; ptr1->next = ptr2; head = ptr1;} ptr1 = ptr1->next; ptr2 = head;} //////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////// before = head; Imithead1 = Imithead2 = head->next; while (Imithead1 != NULL) { while (Imithead2 != NULL ) { ptr1 = ptr2 =Imithead2; while(ptr1 != NULL ) { if (ptr2->data > ptr1->data ) { temp = ptr2; while(temp->next != ptr1) temp = temp->next; before->next = ptr1; temp->next = ptr1->next; ptr1->next = ptr2; Imithead2 = ptr1; } ptr1 = ptr1->next; ptr2 = Imithead2; } before = Imithead2; Imithead2 = Imithead2->next; } Imithead1 = Imithead1->next; Imithead2 = Imithead1; } } }
Swapping Data
C Syntax (Toggle Plain Text)
NodeEmp *Ptr1,*Ptr2; Ptr1 = Ptr2 = Emp; if (Emp != NULL && Emp->next != NULL){ while (Ptr1 != NULL) { Ptr2= Ptr1; while(Ptr2!= NULL){ swap(Ptr1,Ptr2); Ptr2 = Ptr2->next; } Ptr1 = Ptr1->next; } }
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by onickel
Hi!
Pls, somebody help me!! I'm stuck here since days. I don't know, what i'm doing wrong.
I finally found the solution. I'm posting the method for sorting below:
C Syntax (Toggle Plain Text)
void List::listsort(){ element *p, *n, *flag, *anterior; bool sortiert; do { p = head; n = head -> next; for (int i = 0; i< anzahl; i++) { if (p -> nummer < n -> nummer) { p = n; n = n-> next; sortiert = 1; } else { //jetzt wird geordnet sortiert = 0; flag = n; p -> next = flag -> next; //p (tail) mußt zu 0 zeigen. Bevor: p -> n -> 0 n -> next = p; //n -> p statt n -> 0 anterior = head; for (int j=1; j<i; j++) { //damit j=1 wird in eine vor p gehalten anterior = anterior -> next; //anterior wird bewegt genau vor p (anterior -> p -> n -> 0) } anterior -> next = n; //damit wird anterior Nachfolgers n if (p -> next == 0) { //d.h. tail!!!! tail = p; n -> next = tail; number = (tail -> nummer) + 1; //der nächste nummer von tail } else { n = n -> next -> next; } // p = head; // n = head -> next; } } } while (!sortiert); }
![]() |
Similar Threads
- how to create linked list? (C)
- Sorting alphabetically a linked list (C++)
- Sorting/Returning a Linked List (C++)
- Implementing a Sorting Algorithm into a Linked List Insert Function (C)
- Problem sorting a simple linked list (C)
Other Threads in the C Forum
- Previous Thread: quadratic equation
- Next Thread: c vs h header files...
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
* adobe ansi api array asterisks binarysearch calculate centimeter changingto char character cm convert copyimagefile copypdffile cprogramme creafecopyofanytypeoffileinc createcopyoffile csyntax database directory feet fflush fgets file fork forloop frequency givemetehcodez grade gtkgcurlcompiling gtkwinlinux hacking highest histogram homework i/o inches infiniteloop input intmain() iso kernel keyboard km linked linkedlist linux linuxsegmentationfault list locate looping loopinsideloop. lowest match microsoft mqqueue mysql number oddnumber odf open opendocumentformat owf pattern pdf performance posix probleminc process program programming radix recv recvblocked repetition research reversing scanf scheduling segmentationfault send sequential socket socketprograming stack standard string systemcall threads turboc unix user variable voidmain() wab whythiscodecausesegmentationfault windows.h windowsapi






