•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Linux Users Lounge section within the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 402,000 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,460 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Linux Users Lounge advertiser: Lunarpages Linux Web Hosting
Views: 1729 | Replies: 7
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 158
Reputation:
Rep Power: 2
Solved Threads: 0
Hi,
Just came acrosss this article
Linus fires latest shot in GNOME Wars
http://applications.linux.com/applications/07/02/16/1937237.shtml?tid=26&tid=13&tid=22
As far as I know, Linus Torvalds was the gentleman who started Linux OS by putting the first bit of code together, so why he is against another open source movement called GNOME. I did get some hints from the articled that underline his anger at GNOME, but what actually is the story here. Can any one, particularly from the open source community please explain it to me in simple terms. Thanks.
Just came acrosss this article
Linus fires latest shot in GNOME Wars
http://applications.linux.com/applications/07/02/16/1937237.shtml?tid=26&tid=13&tid=22
As far as I know, Linus Torvalds was the gentleman who started Linux OS by putting the first bit of code together, so why he is against another open source movement called GNOME. I did get some hints from the articled that underline his anger at GNOME, but what actually is the story here. Can any one, particularly from the open source community please explain it to me in simple terms. Thanks.
>so why he is against another open source movement called GNOME
He isn't exactly mad at the whole idea behind GNOME; there's nothing wrong with wanting to create a window manager for Linux.
What he's saying is that GNOME is an oversimplified interface for idiots. Basically he likes the added power that KDE gives. He also disapproves of the developers behind it, in other words he says they don't want to fix and patch for updates; don't want to admit it has problems, yada yada yada.
He then goes and releases a bunch of fixes for GNOME just to prove how bad he says it really is.
So now you might be interested in which side I take. Neither. I use Enlightenment; GNOME and KDE use way too much memory. :p
He isn't exactly mad at the whole idea behind GNOME; there's nothing wrong with wanting to create a window manager for Linux.
What he's saying is that GNOME is an oversimplified interface for idiots. Basically he likes the added power that KDE gives. He also disapproves of the developers behind it, in other words he says they don't want to fix and patch for updates; don't want to admit it has problems, yada yada yada.
He then goes and releases a bunch of fixes for GNOME just to prove how bad he says it really is.
So now you might be interested in which side I take. Neither. I use Enlightenment; GNOME and KDE use way too much memory. :p
tuxation.com - Linux articles, tutorials, and discussions
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England (LOL)
Posts: 11,937
Reputation:
Rep Power: 30
Solved Threads: 268
i liek GNOME.
In case the OP is not a linux user let me explain:
KDE and GNOME are the main desktops
Gnome = simple, good looking, just works (kinda like OSX
)
KDE = more options for configurability, doesn treat you like an idiot
(mire windowsey feel too)
In case the OP is not a linux user let me explain:
KDE and GNOME are the main desktops
Gnome = simple, good looking, just works (kinda like OSX
)KDE = more options for configurability, doesn treat you like an idiot
(mire windowsey feel too)
TRY MY SUGGESTIONS AT YOUR OWN RISK!
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 158
Reputation:
Rep Power: 2
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
i liek GNOME.
In case the OP is not a linux user let me explain:
KDE and GNOME are the main desktops
Gnome = simple, good looking, just works (kinda like OSX)
KDE = more options for configurability, doesn treat you like an idiot
(mire windowsey feel too)
Thanks mate, was just curiuos about the whold drama posted all over the net.
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England (LOL)
Posts: 11,937
Reputation:
Rep Power: 30
Solved Threads: 268
I like gnome too. I find kde a bit tacky and memory hungry. Gnome just works.
TRY MY SUGGESTIONS AT YOUR OWN RISK!
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Posts: 180
Reputation:
Rep Power: 5
Solved Threads: 3
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England (LOL)
Posts: 11,937
Reputation:
Rep Power: 30
Solved Threads: 268
It uses much less than KDE in my experience
If you are using SuSE or Fedora knome will use vast amounts of memory due to Beagle desktop search. This has now been scrapped.
If you are using SuSE or Fedora knome will use vast amounts of memory due to Beagle desktop search. This has now been scrapped.
TRY MY SUGGESTIONS AT YOUR OWN RISK!
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
![]() |
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Linux Users Lounge Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
•
•
•
•
apple bbc cellphone computer core debian dell desktop development drivers enterprise fedora fiji firefox games gentoo gpl hardware ibm install internet kernel laptop linux livecd microsoft mobile mozilla news novell open open source open-source openoffice operating os reactos red hat security server software source sun system telephony ubuntu unix vista web windows
- trying to move to linux, need some help (*nix Software)
- i don't know how to install linux (*nix Software)
Other Threads in the Linux Users Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Kismet config file
- Next Thread: postfix mail server configuration



Linear Mode