•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the White Papers section within the White Papers category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 391,558 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,695 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our White Papers advertiser:
Views: 3763 | Replies: 0
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lawn Guylen, NY
Posts: 10,879
Reputation:
Rep Power: 32
Solved Threads: 106
While there is little dispute among IT professionals regarding the impact of disk fragmentation on system performance, no independent guidelines exist to recommend the frequency of defragmentation across an infrastructure. Some IT professionals use defragmentation as a measure of last resort, defragmenting only after system performance has sufficiently degraded to make its impact directly noticeable to users. Others proactively schedule disk defragmentation regularly, with the intent of eliminating the gradual accumulation of fragmented files.
Last edited by cscgal : May 4th, 2007 at 3:11 am.
![]() |
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb White Papers Marketplace
Similar Threads
- Speed Up (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Computer slowing down (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Connecting multiple drives together? (Storage)
- Access Denied (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Disk Warrior: Delete contiguous space? (Mac Software)
- 'A disk read error occurred' (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Hard disk problems -Fragmentation- (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
Other Threads in the White Papers Forum
- Previous Thread: Virtualization and Disk Performance
- Next Thread: Defragmentation's Hidden Value for the Enterprise



Linear Mode