| | |
web design: tables versus divs
Please support our HTML and CSS advertiser: PostgreSQL or MySQL? Compare and contrast the two most popular open source databases
![]() |
A lot of web developers are strongly opinionated that divs should be used for design and tables for tabular data, but I am still not entirely convinced that website designers should jump on it yet. I haved designed web sites using both, and in my experience I have found that carefully using tables produces more cross browser compatible designs than using divs carefully. Does anybody have any strong evidence or convictions on either side of the fence for this argument?
Need a website designer? arizona web design : phoenix web design : MCP Media intelligent web design and web development solutions. MCP Media is owned and operated by Chris Hooley - who happens to be a real nerd... on purpose :-)
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
With divs, people can't steal your images if you use
unless they really want to
In my (about 5) websites, I find that divs load faster, but that's probably just my head. Tables for layouts are frowed upon by the most hard core "standards" people. I dunno, I started learning HTML with XHTML 1.0 Strict, and now I use 1.1, so I guess you could say I never did dabble in table layouts. Anyways... nuff babbling, I say divs
HTML and CSS Syntax (Toggle Plain Text)
style="background-image:url('/temp/img.jpg');"
In my (about 5) websites, I find that divs load faster, but that's probably just my head. Tables for layouts are frowed upon by the most hard core "standards" people. I dunno, I started learning HTML with XHTML 1.0 Strict, and now I use 1.1, so I guess you could say I never did dabble in table layouts. Anyways... nuff babbling, I say divs
I also agree that divs load faster. People can steal your images either way
Table people can use table background="/temp/img.jpg" - In any case, I still say divs. The DaniWeb header, footer, and nearly all of the homepage are all div tags. Anyone find it not cross-browser compatible? Personally I feel that I can do more nifty things with div/css than I could do with tables to make it MORE cross-browser compatible
Table people can use table background="/temp/img.jpg" - In any case, I still say divs. The DaniWeb header, footer, and nearly all of the homepage are all div tags. Anyone find it not cross-browser compatible? Personally I feel that I can do more nifty things with div/css than I could do with tables to make it MORE cross-browser compatible
![]() |
Similar Threads
- web design agency (Web Development Job Offers)
- Professional web design and programming services (Post your Resume)
- Eyepinch, Inc. Professional Web Design (Post your Resume)
Other Threads in the HTML and CSS Forum
- Previous Thread: How to make title bar not dissappear when changing pages
- Next Thread: XHTML Complient parser?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
appointments asp background backgroundcolor beta browser bug calendar cart cgi code codeinjection corporateidentity css design development displayimageinsteadofflash dreamweaver emailmarketing epilepsy explorer firefox flash form format google griefers hackers hitcounter hover html ie7 ie8 iframe image images internet internetexplorer intranet iphone javascript jpeg layout macbook maps marketshare microsoft mozilla multimedia navigationbars news offshoreoutsourcingcompany opacity opera optimization pnginie6 positioning problem scroll seo shopping swf swf. textcolor timecolor titletags url urlseparatedwords visualization web webdevelopment webform website windows7






