| | |
e-Directory vs. Active Directory
![]() |
I'd like to add my 2 cents to this thread. In general, I'm not for any Microsoft products. However, Novell's e-directory adds a second layer of support, cost, and overhead to something that may already do what you need it to. If you're running a Windows only world, and AD does just what you need it to, there really is no need to use NDS.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- News Story: Now You Can Have Linux And Active Directory Too (Linux Servers and Apache)
- Where does the Active Directory know to find.. (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- try to access Active Directory in .NET -->system.runtime.interopservices.comexception (VB.NET)
- Unable to install Active Directory; Access is denied (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Intergrating with Active Directory (OS X)
- Integrating with Active Directory (OS X)
Other Threads in the Novell Forum
- Previous Thread: what do you think of novell?
- Next Thread: RH Linux, eDirectory & 3rd party apps
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
canonical centos china community copyright darlmcbride debian dell desktop development distributions fedora firing foss fud gentoo globaleconomy google gos hp ibm indemnification jimwhitehurst joebrockmeier law layoffs linpus linustorvalds linux mandriva microsoft mint money netbooks news novell novellsuse opensolaris opensource opensuse oracle patents paycuts rbuilder recession redhat religion rpath sco security server slackware sled software sun suse susestudio termination thinclients thinkgos ubuntu unix vendors virtualization vmware windows





