 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stack implementation using function pointers in C
Thread Solved |
Hi,
I did the stack implementation using arrays and i would like to do it with function pointers but i have no idea. If anyone could help by illustration that would be great as function pointers is pretty difficult for me!
Thanks in advance.
coolguy
I did the stack implementation using arrays and i would like to do it with function pointers but i have no idea. If anyone could help by illustration that would be great as function pointers is pretty difficult for me!
Thanks in advance.
coolguy
Here is a link that gives you links for function pointer tutorials.
http://www.google.com/search?q=funct...inter+tutorial
Given you've already implemented stack, you already know that part. If you are looking for something more specific, you'll have to make the question specific.
http://www.google.com/search?q=funct...inter+tutorial
Given you've already implemented stack, you already know that part. If you are looking for something more specific, you'll have to make the question specific.
Are you Agile.. ?
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,039
Reputation: 
Solved Threads: 139
I am very confused. How in the world are you going to implement a stack using function pointers?
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,600
Reputation: 
Solved Threads: 462
> I am very confused. How in the world are you going to implement a stack using function pointers?
I guess he means by using dynamic memory allocation, using a node structure which holds the data as well as the pointer to the next node.
I guess he means by using dynamic memory allocation, using a node structure which holds the data as well as the pointer to the next node.
I don't accept change; I don't deserve to live.
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,039
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 139
That doesn't involve function pointers though 
Mentioning function pointers must be a sign of being completely lost, since there's only a finite constant set of values a function pointer can attain in any given executable; you might as well implement a stack using a bounded set of integers, or something crazy like that.
Mentioning function pointers must be a sign of being completely lost, since there's only a finite constant set of values a function pointer can attain in any given executable; you might as well implement a stack using a bounded set of integers, or something crazy like that.
 |
Similar Threads
- Integer Stack Copy Function (C++)
- Function pointers inside classes (C++)
- problems with function pointers (C)
- stack of linked lists (C++)
Other Threads in the C Forum
- Previous Thread: arrays
- Next Thread: help with prime numbers!
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
You need to join our community in order to build your list of favorite forums. You can visit the forum index for a listing of all forums.
Related Forum Features
Latest C Posts
- Today's Posts
- Unanswered Threads
#include * ansi api array arrays binarysearch calculate centimeter changingto char character convert copyanyfile copypdffile creafecopyofanytypeoffileinc createcopyoffile createprocess() database directory dynamic fflush fgets file floatingpointvalidation forloop frequency function getlasterror getlogicaldrivestrin givemetehcodez grade graphics gtkgcurlcompiling gtkwinlinux highest histogram homework i/o inches include infiniteloop input interest intmain() iso keyboard km linked linkedlist linux list looping loopinsideloop. lowest matrix microsoft mysql oddnumber open opendocumentformat openwebfoundation pdf pointer posix power program programming pyramidusingturboccodes radix read recursion recv recvblocked repetition reversing scanf scheduling segmentationfault send sequential shape single socketprogramming stack standard strchr string suggestions test threads turboc unix urboc user variable whythiscodecausesegmentationfault win32api windows.h windowsapi
