| | |
Windows Small Business Server vs. Windows XP Pro.
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I am setting up a server that consists of 6 clients, but I'm not sure if getting Windows Small Business Server is the right thing to do. The only thing the "server" will be is a shared file hub, where each client will need access to a few partitioned drives simultaneously. Would anyone suggest that Windows XP Pro. could handle this need as long as the hardware was sufficient??
See both way of accessing is different. If you plan to setup a server enviornment then your SBS will act as a domain controller and you will have better control over your users and resources on the server.
But if your main purpose is to share files without any security concern then making a shared folder on a windows XP box is the best bet in a workgroup environment.
Let me know..
But if your main purpose is to share files without any security concern then making a shared folder on a windows XP box is the best bet in a workgroup environment.
Let me know..
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Windows 2003 Server RC2 and Windows Server Small Business running together? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Is it possible to connect Windows XP Home Edition to a SBS 2003? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Small Business Server 2003 SMTP Problem (Windows Servers and IIS)
- Remote Desktop Troubleshooting (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- Sharing Problems On Windows XP Pro User Limt? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Problem with Access Database Documenter (Windows Software)
- Windows XP pro stalls on start up, XP logo faded out (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- MS Small Business Server: Does anyone know about security vulnerabilities? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- windows xp pro corperate... (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
Other Threads in the Windows Servers and IIS Forum
- Previous Thread: Websites not available
- Next Thread: How to unblock the firewall in windows server 2003
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |






