DaniWeb Forum Index > Software Development > C++

C++ RSS

ambigious part 5

Please support our C++ advertiser: Intel Parallel Studio Home

•

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 31

Reputation: Sukhbir is an unknown quantity at this point

Solved Threads: 0

Sukhbir

Offline

Light Poster

ambigious part 5

Aug 6th, 2004

LOOK THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT

int *p[]();

PLS TELL ME THE MEANING OF THIS STATEMENT.& WHERE WE USE THIS STATEMENT.

•

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 4,413

Reputation: Dave Sinkula has a brilliant future

Solved Threads: 248

Dave Sinkula Dave Sinkula is offline

Offline

long time no c

Re: ambigious part 5

Aug 6th, 2004

I believe it is invalid syntax. Did you mean a declaration for an array of pointers returning int and taking no parameters?

Help with Code Tags

(Toggle Plain Text)

#include <iostream>
  
  int foo() { std::cout << "foo\n"; return 0; }
  int bar() { std::cout << "bar\n"; return 0; }
  
  int main()
  {
     int (*p[])() = {foo,bar};
     p[0]();
     p[1]();
     return 0;
  }
  
  /* my output
  foo
  bar
  */

"One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary." --Ayn Rand

•

Join Date: Dec 2003

Posts: 2,414

Reputation: alc6379 has a spectacular aura about

Solved Threads: 123

alc6379

Offline

Cookie... That's it

Re: ambigious part 5

Aug 6th, 2004

Sukhbir:

Can you please stop naming your threads "Ambiguous part #", and start naming them with a title that indicates what you're asking?

One of the keys to getting responses to your posts is to post a relevant topic to your question. "Ambiguous part #" is, well, ambiguous.

Alex Cavnar, aka alc6379