fibonacci
Please support our C++ advertiser: Programming Forums
Thread Solved
![]() |
Hey guys,
I'm supposed to write a program that will calculate the Nth fibonacci number, without using recursion.
I have the recursion problem written already, but am having a hard time doing the iterative one.
here's my recursion function:
any help with getting me started on the iterative one?
I'm supposed to write a program that will calculate the Nth fibonacci number, without using recursion.
I have the recursion problem written already, but am having a hard time doing the iterative one.
here's my recursion function:
int fib ( int n )
{
if ( n <= 1 )
return 1 ;
else
return ( fib ( n - 1 ) + ( fib ( n - 2 ) ) ) ;
}any help with getting me started on the iterative one?
It is practically impossible to teach good programming style to students that have had prior exposure to Basic; as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
-Edsger Dijkstra
-Edsger Dijkstra
Nevermind, I got it working. Didn't think to use an array; well I thought about it, but didn't think it would make the problem easier. Here's my fibonacci sequence, written iteratively.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std ;
int main ( )
{
int fibArray[25] ; //max fib number
fibArray[0] = 1 ;
fibArray[1] = 1 ;
for ( int i = 2 ; i < 25 ; i ++ )
fibArray[ i ] = fibArray[ i - 1 ] + fibArray[ i - 2 ] ;
cout << fibArray[4] << "\t" << fibArray[7] << "\t" << fibArray[24] << endl ;
return 0 ;
} It is practically impossible to teach good programming style to students that have had prior exposure to Basic; as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
-Edsger Dijkstra
-Edsger Dijkstra
Your array based solution is limiting in that you have set the array size to the number of values to display.
What about a purely iterative solution, that does not need the excess memory, and is not logically limited in the number of values to display?
What about a purely iterative solution, that does not need the excess memory, and is not logically limited in the number of values to display?
#include <iostream>
using namespace std ;
int main ( )
{
unsigned int fib ; //current fibonnaci value
unsigned int n1 = 1 ;
unsigned int n2 = 1 ;
int max_fib;
cout << "Enter number of term for Fibonacci series: " ;
cin >> max_fib;
cout << n1 << '\t' << n2 << '\t';
for ( int i = 2 ; i < max_fib; i ++ )
{
fib = n1 + n2;
n1 = n2;
n2 = fib;
cout << fib << "\t" ;
if( i % 5 == 0 ) //five numbers per line
cout << endl;
}
return 0 ;
} Looking for an exciting graduate degree? Robotics and Intelligent Autonomous Systems (RIAS) at SDSM&T See the program brochure here.
>What about a purely iterative solution, that does not need the excess
>memory, and is not logically limited in the number of values to display?
That's fine for just printing the sequence. The array is more open to extension though. Let's say you want to write fib(x) where x is the number and the function returns
. With the array you can do this:
At the (minor, in this case) cost of extra storage, you avoid recalculating parts of the sequence that you've already calculated. That's the principle behind the dynamic recursive algorithm.
>memory, and is not logically limited in the number of values to display?
That's fine for just printing the sequence. The array is more open to extension though. Let's say you want to write fib(x) where x is the number and the function returns
int fib ( int x )
{
static const int max = 25;
static int n = 2;
static int fibArray[max] = {1,1};
while ( n < x ) {
fibArray[n] = fibArray[n - 1] + fibArray[n - 2];
++n;
}
return fibArray[x];
} seeing as this is being discussed still, I would like to pose another question: How do I use an array using recursion? This will be more efficient, no? Here is my current code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std ;
int fib ( int ) ;
int main ( )
{
int i = fib ( 5 ) ;
cout << i << endl ;
return 0 ;
}
int fib ( int n )
{
int fibArray [ const n ] ;
if ( <= 1 )
return 1 ;
else
{
fibArray[ 0 ] = 1 ;
fibArray[ 1 ] = 1 ;
for ( int i = 2 ; i < 25 ; i++ )
fibArray[ i ] = ( fib ( n - 1 ) + ( fib ( n - 2 ) ) ) ;
}
return fibArray[ n ] ;
} Last edited by Duki : Oct 24th, 2007 at 8:31 pm.
It is practically impossible to teach good programming style to students that have had prior exposure to Basic; as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
-Edsger Dijkstra
-Edsger Dijkstra
•
•
•
•
seeing as this is being discussed still, I would like to pose another question: How do I use an array using recursion? This will be more efficient, no? Here is my current code:
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int fib ( int ) ; int main ( ) { int i = fib ( 5 ) ; cout << i << endl ; return 0 ; } int fib ( int n ) { int fibArray [ const n ] ; if ( <= 1 ) return 1 ; else { fibArray[ 0 ] = 1 ; fibArray[ 1 ] = 1 ; for ( int i = 2 ; i < 25 ; i++ ) fibArray[ i ] = ( fib ( n - 1 ) + ( fib ( n - 2 ) ) ) ; } return fibArray[ n ] ; }
why can i not do int fibArray [ n ] ? It says "expected constant"
It is practically impossible to teach good programming style to students that have had prior exposure to Basic; as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
-Edsger Dijkstra
-Edsger Dijkstra
That's a compiler dependent problem now.
Previously, any declaration of a local array had to be done with a constant expression as the size. The latest C standard (C99) has changed that restriction, but not all compilers have adopted that. And remember, the C++ standard includes the C standard, more or less.
So, legally speaking:
is now a legitimate construct. Current version of gcc supports this. Visual C++ does not.
Now I have to go change my lesson plans.....
Val
Previously, any declaration of a local array had to be done with a constant expression as the size. The latest C standard (C99) has changed that restriction, but not all compilers have adopted that. And remember, the C++ standard includes the C standard, more or less.
So, legally speaking:
int size = 5; int arr[size];
Now I have to go change my lesson plans.....
Val
Looking for an exciting graduate degree? Robotics and Intelligent Autonomous Systems (RIAS) at SDSM&T See the program brochure here.
Ok, I got it to work using a pointer. Here's my code.
I can't get it to work with numbers >=12; it gives a system error that it failed unexpectedly. I'm guessing it's a stack issue, but is there a way around it? Is my program the best it can be (using recursion and arrays)?
c++ Syntax (Toggle Plain Text)
#include <ctime> #include <iostream> using namespace std ; int fib ( int ) ; int main ( ) { clock_t start ; clock_t end ; cout << "Beginning timer..." << endl ; start = clock() ; cout << endl ; for ( int k = 0 ; k < 12 ; k++ ) { int i = fib ( k ) ; cout << i << "\t" ; } cout << endl ; end = clock() ; cout << "\nThe calculation took " << ( double ( end ) - start ) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC << " seconds.\n" ; cout << "\n\n-- Done --\n\n" ; return 0 ; } int fib ( int n ) { int * fibArray = new int[ n ] ; if ( n <= 1 ) return 1 ; else { fibArray[ 0 ] = 1 ; fibArray[ 1 ] = 1 ; for ( int i = 2 ; i <= n ; i++ ) fibArray [ i ] = ( fib ( n - 1 ) + ( fib ( n - 2 ) ) ) ; } return fibArray[ n ] ; }
I can't get it to work with numbers >=12; it gives a system error that it failed unexpectedly. I'm guessing it's a stack issue, but is there a way around it? Is my program the best it can be (using recursion and arrays)?
Last edited by Duki : Oct 25th, 2007 at 12:44 am.
It is practically impossible to teach good programming style to students that have had prior exposure to Basic; as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
-Edsger Dijkstra
-Edsger Dijkstra
>And remember, the C++ standard includes the C standard, more or less.
Standard C++ currently maintains compatibility with C89, not C99. So you can't use VLAs in C++
>Is my program the best it can be (using recursion and arrays)?
No. The entire point of using an array with recursion is to avoid recalculating everything all the time. This is especially true with the Fibonacci sequence, where a lot of the numbers have to be recalculated. You use an array, but you don't take advantage of it, so your function is just a slower, more wasteful version of the original recursive algorithm.
What you need is for the array to persist between function calls and be able to tell if a number has been calculated or not. If it has, you don't need to go through the recursive chain. This is where you'll see performance improvements:
Standard C++ currently maintains compatibility with C89, not C99. So you can't use VLAs in C++
>Is my program the best it can be (using recursion and arrays)?
No. The entire point of using an array with recursion is to avoid recalculating everything all the time. This is especially true with the Fibonacci sequence, where a lot of the numbers have to be recalculated. You use an array, but you don't take advantage of it, so your function is just a slower, more wasteful version of the original recursive algorithm.
What you need is for the array to persist between function calls and be able to tell if a number has been calculated or not. If it has, you don't need to go through the recursive chain. This is where you'll see performance improvements:
cplusplus Syntax (Toggle Plain Text)
int fib ( int n ) { static int fibArray[25] = {0}; if ( n <= 1 ) return 1; else { fibArray[0] = 1; fibArray[1] = 1; for ( int i = 2 ; i <= n ; i++ ) { if ( fibArray[i] == 0 ) fibArray[i] = ( fib ( n - 1 ) + ( fib ( n - 2 ) ) ); } } return fibArray[n]; }
> I can't get it to work with numbers >=12; it gives a system error that it failed unexpectedly.
1. You don't free the memory you allocate. Eventually, you'll run out of memory.
2. You run off the end of the memory allocated.
If you want <= n, then you need to allocate n+1 items.
It was always wrong, you just got caught with your hand in the cookie jar at n >= 12.
3. Unlike Ptolemy's answer, your array serves no purpose.
1. You don't free the memory you allocate. Eventually, you'll run out of memory.
2. You run off the end of the memory allocated.
for ( int i = 2 ; i <= n ; i++ )If you want <= n, then you need to allocate n+1 items.
It was always wrong, you just got caught with your hand in the cookie jar at n >= 12.
3. Unlike Ptolemy's answer, your array serves no purpose.
If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
UK Voter? Please send a message to Incapability Brown and the rest of Zanu-Labour
Up to 8Mb PlusNet broadband from only £5.99 a month!
UK Voter? Please send a message to Incapability Brown and the rest of Zanu-Labour
Up to 8Mb PlusNet broadband from only £5.99 a month!
![]() |
Similar Threads
Other Threads in the C++ Forum
- C++ Fibonacci program help (C++)
- I need help writing a program using Fibonacci sequence (C++)
- Help,Fibonacci numbers (VB.NET)
- Fibonacci number (C)
- Really Weird Error... Fibonacci Nums (C++)
Other Threads in the C++ Forum
- Previous Thread: Please Help Dynamic Memory Allocation.
- Next Thread: homework help
•
•
•
•
Views: 3716 | Replies: 12 | Currently Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)






Linear Mode