•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM section within the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 402,549 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,293 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Motherboards, CPUs and RAM advertiser: Programming Forums
Views: 3304 | Replies: 13
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,735
Reputation:
Rep Power: 15
Solved Threads: 136
It's PC3200 (400MHz) modules 
And if you can detect a performance difference between using 2 x 512Mb modules and using 1 x 1Gb module, then you've a good 'measuring tape' and a mighty fine pair of eyes
Anyway, why are you worrying about tiny little insignificant considerations like that when you have a rather run-of-the-mill display card in your system? In terms of sheer speed, a 9600XT is not really any better than a Gf4Ti4200, (although you can get better image quality out of it) and it's certainly not even up to the standard of the rather cheap GeForce FX5900XT.
If you've a mind to the future, that card isn't gonna cut it, I'm sorry to say. It might be a worthy companion to your Celeron, but it'd be a performance bottleneck for gaming on an Athlon64 system.

And if you can detect a performance difference between using 2 x 512Mb modules and using 1 x 1Gb module, then you've a good 'measuring tape' and a mighty fine pair of eyes

Anyway, why are you worrying about tiny little insignificant considerations like that when you have a rather run-of-the-mill display card in your system? In terms of sheer speed, a 9600XT is not really any better than a Gf4Ti4200, (although you can get better image quality out of it) and it's certainly not even up to the standard of the rather cheap GeForce FX5900XT.
If you've a mind to the future, that card isn't gonna cut it, I'm sorry to say. It might be a worthy companion to your Celeron, but it'd be a performance bottleneck for gaming on an Athlon64 system.
maybe when the current ones go down like the new Nvidia or ATi cards cost $400+ and I dont feel like spending that much for a video card.
Hows a 9800XT, 256MB?
Also right now my 9600XT is only running at 4x because thats what my current mobo allows.
8x should be better.
I just want my games to run smoother then they are now, they tend to slow down and look like they're in slow motion.
Hows a 9800XT, 256MB?
Also right now my 9600XT is only running at 4x because thats what my current mobo allows.
8x should be better.
I just want my games to run smoother then they are now, they tend to slow down and look like they're in slow motion.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,735
Reputation:
Rep Power: 15
Solved Threads: 136
I'd consider a 9800 Pro to be a far better value purchase than a 9800XT. You don't get enough extra performance from the XT to justify the extra dollars, and most Pros overclock to XT levels quite easily.
Be wary, though to get a 9800 Pro with "256-bit memory interface'. There are several companies sell '9800 Pros' with a crippled 128-bit memory interface. They only have half the bandwidth, and perform only a tiny bit better than the 9600XT, which makes them a rip-off.
A full-featured 9800 Pro is obtainable quite cheaply nowadays.
ATi Radeon 9xxx cards often have stability issues with AGP 8X, and you might need to set AGP to 4X anyway to get the card to run stable. Disabling AGP fast writes is another thing many people have had to do. AGP 8X doen't improve performance anyway, so it's not a problem to set the interface back a bit.
The new generation cards are much better, although a bit more expensive, and NVidia have regained credibility and the 'crown'.
The 6800 standard is a quite good card, and outperforms a 9800XT quite noticeably. The 6800GT is the current best-value card amongst the high-end options available, and is an extremely good card which outperforms even the ATi X800XT in most situations.
Be wary, though to get a 9800 Pro with "256-bit memory interface'. There are several companies sell '9800 Pros' with a crippled 128-bit memory interface. They only have half the bandwidth, and perform only a tiny bit better than the 9600XT, which makes them a rip-off.
A full-featured 9800 Pro is obtainable quite cheaply nowadays.
ATi Radeon 9xxx cards often have stability issues with AGP 8X, and you might need to set AGP to 4X anyway to get the card to run stable. Disabling AGP fast writes is another thing many people have had to do. AGP 8X doen't improve performance anyway, so it's not a problem to set the interface back a bit.
The new generation cards are much better, although a bit more expensive, and NVidia have regained credibility and the 'crown'.
The 6800 standard is a quite good card, and outperforms a 9800XT quite noticeably. The 6800GT is the current best-value card amongst the high-end options available, and is an extremely good card which outperforms even the ATi X800XT in most situations.
![]() |
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Other Threads in the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Forum
- Previous Thread: Asrock p4s55fx MOBO help.
- Next Thread: Abit BH-6 Motherboard / Nvidia GeForce DDR Display adapter



Linear Mode