| | |
![]() |
Members are directed towards the forum rules page twice times during the registration process (once via PM and once via email) in addition to being told to read the rules throughout the site and in all of the forum announcements. Additionally, everytime anyone receives any type of infraction or infraction warning, and anytime any moderation action is taken upon a post or thread (i.e. code tags were added by a mod, a thread was moved, etc) they receive a PM with a link to the forum rules telling them to reread them.
In other words, in the ten minutes it takes for a new user to register, activate their email address, and start a new thread in the C++ forum leaving out code tags in their post, they've been warned about using code tags once via email, once via PM, once in a forum announcement directly next to the 'new thread' button that they clicked on, and in a watermark behind the editor they typed in.
After the post is made, as soon as a moderator sees it, they'll receive another PM saying their post was edited because of code tags and to reread the forum rules along with yet another PM saying they received an infraction warning for violating the rules and to reread them. Each of these PMs, of course, links directly to the forum rules page.
Requiring them to visit an extra page during the registration process couldn't possibly help anymore than is already being done and would do nothing other than add an extra step and deter users from completing the registration process. New users would see it as nothing more than an extra pain-in-the-neck click they need to make with their mouse before they can get started.
In other words, in the ten minutes it takes for a new user to register, activate their email address, and start a new thread in the C++ forum leaving out code tags in their post, they've been warned about using code tags once via email, once via PM, once in a forum announcement directly next to the 'new thread' button that they clicked on, and in a watermark behind the editor they typed in.
After the post is made, as soon as a moderator sees it, they'll receive another PM saying their post was edited because of code tags and to reread the forum rules along with yet another PM saying they received an infraction warning for violating the rules and to reread them. Each of these PMs, of course, links directly to the forum rules page.
Requiring them to visit an extra page during the registration process couldn't possibly help anymore than is already being done and would do nothing other than add an extra step and deter users from completing the registration process. New users would see it as nothing more than an extra pain-in-the-neck click they need to make with their mouse before they can get started.
Last edited by cscgal; Nov 15th, 2007 at 10:31 pm. Reason: Addendum
Dani the Computer Science Gal 
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/DaniWeb
And if you're interested in Internet marketing there is twitter.com/DaniWebAds

Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/DaniWeb
And if you're interested in Internet marketing there is twitter.com/DaniWebAds
You have to wonder with so many "bullets" being fired at them how they manage to still get to the forum and still make a complete mess of it.
If they get an infraction (and a PM), they should not be allowed to post until they've read the PM and clicked on some "I acknowledge this infraction and will do better next time" link.
If they get an infraction (and a PM), they should not be allowed to post until they've read the PM and clicked on some "I acknowledge this infraction and will do better next time" link.
Never... You see those people as pesky nuiscances.
Dani sees them as, I dunno, customers? And every new customer has the potential to earn her more revenue. I.e. more ppl going to potentially click on ads etc.
That's why her to attitude to newbies will never change.
-There will never be an automatic script that detects when code tags are not used.
-There will not be any extra scripts directing newbies to the rules page.
-Anything that makes it more difficult for newbies to post, will be ignored no matter how much sense it makes.
It's all about quantity than quality. Get used to it. Plus it also gives the mods a sense of purpose. Awww
Dani sees them as, I dunno, customers? And every new customer has the potential to earn her more revenue. I.e. more ppl going to potentially click on ads etc.
That's why her to attitude to newbies will never change.
-There will never be an automatic script that detects when code tags are not used.
-There will not be any extra scripts directing newbies to the rules page.
-Anything that makes it more difficult for newbies to post, will be ignored no matter how much sense it makes.
It's all about quantity than quality. Get used to it. Plus it also gives the mods a sense of purpose. Awww
Last edited by iamthwee; Nov 16th, 2007 at 3:46 pm.
*Voted best profile in the world*
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Disable access to .htaccess (Linux Servers and Apache)
- Windows 2000 pro - svchost.exe using 100% cpu (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Any advice about folder size viewer (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- another newbie with alot of redhat and apache server Q'S (Linux Servers and Apache)
- ...Not sure where the problem lies... (Web Browsers)
- VMWare Red Hat 9 VMWare Tools and DNS (*nix Software)
- Monitor or Video Card problem?? (Monitors, Displays and Video Cards)
- drivespace3 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- make?? (*nix Software)
- Gallery v1.3.4 (*nix Software)
Other Threads in the DaniWeb Community Feedback Forum
- Previous Thread: Ignoring people
- Next Thread: Titles
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
+ abuse beginners bookmark bored box bug bugs calamity code codebox codesnippets codetags code_snippet comments cpuintensive daniweb design editcodesnippet end-of-the-world favouriteforums feedback ff3 flamewar glitch ie6 itsatag! kids layout login lulz negative newfeature poll post preview privatemessaging problem profanitytest profile quality quick rash-bot rashakil-fol reply reputation reputation-power sandwich score search snippet socialgroups solvedthreads sub-forum suggestion tagcloud tagging tags theactualrulerofthetag-cloud:3 therulerofthetag-cloud:[ thread threadtagging today's-posts unansweredposts upgrade user voting whining






