•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the C++ section within the Software Development category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 455,987 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 3,782 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our C++ advertiser: Programming Forums
Views: 2341 | Replies: 4
 |
| |
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Petoskey, Mi
Posts: 38
Reputation: 
Rep Power: 2
Solved Threads: 0
Light Poster
New to try/catch Can someone please explain to me just exactly this try/catch is doing? It doesn't seem to make any sense to me. Thank you in advance.
case '\r': if (Choice==(CancelIndex+1))return; try{(*Action[Choice-1])();} catch(...){} system("cls"); Choice = 1; break; case char(27): if ((CancelIndex+1)==ItemCount)return; try{(*Action[ItemCount-1])();} catch(...){} Choice = 1; break;
Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school.
•
•
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,507
Reputation: 
Rep Power: 31
Solved Threads: 487
>Can someone please explain to me just exactly this try/catch is doing?
It's swallowing errors, basically ignoring them.
It's swallowing errors, basically ignoring them.
I'm here to prove you wrong.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Petoskey, Mi
Posts: 38
Reputation:
Rep Power: 2
Solved Threads: 0
Light Poster
Is there really any reason to have in the code, or is this just a half-hearted attempt at trying to error detection?
Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school.
•
•
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,507
Reputation:
Rep Power: 31
Solved Threads: 487
Well, it has a legitimate purpose. The author probably didn't want exceptions to propagate beyond this scope. Without the catch, the unhandled exception would just go on until it hits the first catch or until it goes all the way out of the call stack, in which case the terminate function is called.
I'm not a fan of swallowing exceptions silently (at the very least it should be logged), but I wouldn't call it half-hearted either.
I'm not a fan of swallowing exceptions silently (at the very least it should be logged), but I wouldn't call it half-hearted either.
I'm here to prove you wrong.
|
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb C++ Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Hybrid Mode
Similar Threads
- 'catch' without 'try' (Java)
- How to catch Datagrid error (C#)
- catch and throw (C#)
- problem - one catch block to other catch block of same try block (C)
- try catch and finnaly (Java)
Other Threads in the C++ Forum
- Previous Thread: Need Help With a Loop!!
- Next Thread: how to find highest and lowest number..
