943,865 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
  • Mac OS X Discussion Thread
  • Unsolved
  • Views: 5765
  • Mac OS X RSS
You are currently viewing page 2 of this multi-page discussion thread; Jump to the first page
Jun 21st, 2002
0

Re:no macs?

LOL! yeah, musta been that horrible mac - afterall the CD couldnt have been mislabled!!! ;D
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 186
Solved Threads: 8
Team Member - aka kaynine
aeinstein is offline Offline
643 posts
since May 2002
Jun 22nd, 2002
0

Re:no macs?

I can't believe it was mislabeled. It was funny seeing him pissed.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 18
a.k.a inscissor
samaru is offline Offline
1,227 posts
since Feb 2002
Jun 13th, 2003
0

Re: no macs?

hey i know that this thread is old but i want to know what Amiga is, and y it was so awsome. well thanks for the information.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 36
Solved Threads: 2
PFO Founder
big_k105 is offline Offline
308 posts
since May 2003
Jun 13th, 2003
0

Re: no macs?

Commodore Amigas are from the good ol' days of computers, one of the first personal computers released back in 1985. Most of the Amiga's followers were early-day computer hackers.
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is online now Online
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Jun 13th, 2003
0

Re: no macs?

ok now i know what they are jst needed a little memory refreshing. thanks dani
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 36
Solved Threads: 2
PFO Founder
big_k105 is offline Offline
308 posts
since May 2003
Jun 14th, 2003
0

Amiga facts (was) Re: no macs?

Quote originally posted by big_k105 ...
Hey I know that this thread is old, but I want to know what Amiga is, and y it was so awsome. well thanks for the information.
I was there, so I guess I'll try to give more information...

* The Amiga was based on the Motorola MC68000 processor family, but it wasn't crippled like the Mac or Atari ST -- or massively overpriced like the IBM Model 9000, Sun, and Fortune Systems machines.

* It had 4096 colors at a time when the IBM PC had 64 (or less), the Atari ST had 512, and the Mac had 2.

* It had 2-channel sound when the PC had a beeping speaker (or a sound card based on the SID chip from the Commodore 64), the Mac was a bit better, and the Atari ST had a cheap sound chip.

* It could be expanded to 8 MB memory when the PC was limited to about 2 MB of paged, segmented memory -- and the Mac and ST were limited to about 1 MB or less.

* It had a true preemptively-multitasking operating system when the Mac and ST did not (and could not); the PC had MS-DOS (and Windows still does not preemptively multitask).

* Plug-and-Play was invented on the Amiga; Apple and IBM had to license it.

* It was natively compatible with NTSC video (the system clock was 2x the NTSC color clock), which is what made the NewTek Video Toaster possible.

* When John Lassiter of Pixar told an audience at SIGGraph after a showing of Luxo, Jr. that "Someday, people will be doing this on home PCs" Amiga users already were.

* Much of today's so-called "hacker culture" was originally built around the Amiga, the Legion of Doom, for example. Captain Crunch was also an early adherent.

* The Amiga 3000UX remains, to this day, the only consumer PC to run true AT&T Unix (for what it's worth).

* For many years, the last computer still hooked up to the Space Shuttle on the launchpad before launch was an Amiga 500. It was destroyed by the rocket exhaust.

The Amiga died for, basically, two reasons:

* Commodore never properly promoted the Amiga line. During most of its life, the company was run very poorly.

* The hardware platform itself was very specific, so the user was limited as to how the unit could be expanded or upgraded. The upside to this was a strong reduction in compatibility problems.

Nowadays, there are good-performing Amiga emulators for the Mac and PC platforms (UAE, for example) and a goodly amount of freeware and abandonware available.

It's actually making a comeback of sorts. Check http://www.Amiga.org for info.

I hope that you found this interesting.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 149
Solved Threads: 45
Practically a Posting Shark
TallCool1 is offline Offline
865 posts
since May 2003
Jun 14th, 2003
0

Re: no macs?

Very cool indeed. I get lost in history @ about the time of XEROX's days with GUI's.
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is online now Online
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Jun 14th, 2003
0

Re: no macs?

Quote originally posted by cscgal ...
Commodore Amigas are from the good ol' days of computers, one of the first personal computers released back in 1985. Most of the Amiga's followers were early-day computer hackers.
Hmmmm, I never thought of the Amiga as 'one of the first'. I had a Sinclair Spectrum some time before that. All seems like such a long time ago now .... :shock:
Bob
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 15
Solved Threads: 2
Junior Poster
Bob is offline Offline
129 posts
since Feb 2003
Jul 7th, 2003
0

Re: no macs?

:shock: WOW! :shock:

I must bow down and worship at your feet TallCool1!

That was freakin' awesome.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
Light Poster
MuddBuddha is offline Offline
44 posts
since May 2003

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Mac OS X Forum Timeline: Whoops!
Next Thread in Mac OS X Forum Timeline: Jaguar's just too quiet!





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC