943,503 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
You are currently viewing page 1 of this multi-page discussion thread
Jul 10th, 2003
0

KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

Expand Post »
I'm using Redhat 9.0 in Vmware on an XP host, and have dedicated 92 Megs of RAM for the linux to run on. THis works just fine in text mode, but when I load the gui desktop it runs out of memory and starts paging like mad. Now I understand why the installer recommended 192 Megs RAM! Isnt there a lighter GUI which is less of a memory hog? M winnt server guest does better!

My needs for a gui are simple:
* Run Mozilla
* Gui emacs
* Perhaps the redhat updater (im still trying to decide if its worth it)
* Taskbar which allows multiple instances of above apps (so i can view several webpages at once)

Thats it! Anyone have experience with this topic?

Oh, I'm a bit of a Linux newbie (though comfortable with the basics), so be gentle

/Kandir
Similar Threads
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
kandir is offline Offline
11 posts
since Jul 2003
Jul 10th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

Gnome and KDE are desktop environments, meaning that they're not just window managers. They also add a whole bunch of their own extras (tools, file managers, tidbits, etc etc etc) to XWindows. Perhaps what you're looking for is something like FVWM or LiteStep (check out fvwm.org or litestep.org, although both should be available on the RedHat install CD).
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Jul 10th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

I like blackbox, but I don't think it supports grouping (or even a task manager)
Moderator
Reputation Points: 322
Solved Threads: 28
The C# Man, Myth, Legend
Tekmaven is offline Offline
914 posts
since Feb 2002
Jul 11th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

Well ok, thanks for the info. I'll check up on your suggestions. Perhaps there's hope yet.

Cheers,
Kandir
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
kandir is offline Offline
11 posts
since Jul 2003
Jul 14th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

use fluxbox or xfce4.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
Light Poster
Z28James is offline Offline
44 posts
since Feb 2003
Jul 15th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

My personal recommendation is how I do it:

I run a fairly text-only Linux box, but I install X commands. Then I run X-Win32 (an X server for Windows) on my Windows box. I’m always SSHed into the Linux box, and I have SSH configured to forward X connections, so when I want to run any X app, I just type the command in SSH, and voila, it runs in Windows. Not running the entire KDE or Gnome desktop significantly reduces the amount of memory and other resources the Linux box needs to use to run an X app. It’s probably even better than running a smaller window manager.

I’d be glad to offer details on how to do this if anyone’s interested.
Reputation Points: 14
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
deanpence is offline Offline
19 posts
since Jul 2003
Jul 15th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

Eeeeek! Using x-windows to connect to a linux box running on vmware might be a bit too much for my brain deficiency. I have a hard time figuring out whats up and down as it is...

Interesting approach though.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
kandir is offline Offline
11 posts
since Jul 2003
Jul 15th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

Well, as I said, I don’t use VMWare. I have a separate machine running Linux.
Reputation Points: 14
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
deanpence is offline Offline
19 posts
since Jul 2003
Jul 15th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

Can this be done with PuTTY? I know this program supports forwarding of X? Doesn't it?
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Jul 17th, 2003
0

Re: KDE and Gnome = Bloatware

Quote originally posted by cscgal ...
Can this be done with PuTTY? I know this program supports forwarding of X? Doesn't it?
Yes, that’s exactly what I use (when I need to forward X over SSH), actually. You don’t have to forward X connections over SSH, really, but you can. I would definitely do it if forwarding X connections over a high-speed but insecure network. But on your own firewalled LAN, there’s really no reason to use the SSH method. (I know I said that’s what I do, but now that I think of it, I don’t bother to forward connections over SSH. An X-Windows server is all that’s necessary.)
Reputation Points: 14
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
deanpence is offline Offline
19 posts
since Jul 2003

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Window and Desktop Managers Forum Timeline: killing X
Next Thread in Window and Desktop Managers Forum Timeline: login screen config





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC