943,307 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
Dec 22nd, 2006
0

Re: Microsoftzilla

You FEEL safer using Linux than Windows, but you're not and that's the problem.

The incidence (as percentage of installed base) of successful intrusion attempts against Linux boxes is far higher than that of successful intrusion attempts against Windows boxes.
That's because most Linux boxes are installed wide open by default, and are running a lot of unneeded and potentially dangerous applications like SendMail and Apache without their owners even knowing it.
They think there's nothing to fear because they're not using Windows (they're believing the hype/hoax/lies), and often don't keep up with security and other updates (which is why Windows now comes with automatic updates turned on by default).
As Sendmail especially (but Apache in many versions as well, and X too) is as leaky as a sieve, these systems are easy prey for crackers.
The reasons you don't hear a lot of outcry is because many of the low overall volume, and because a lot of those machines are run by companies who don't want the negative publicity.
duckman
jwenting is offline Offline
7,719 posts
since Nov 2004
Dec 22nd, 2006
0

Re: Microsoftzilla

I do agree that MS make a good effort with patches, and I don't really understand the problem people have, along lines of "Microsoft just released a new patch, that means their software sucks", or even "Microsoft have stopped support for Windows 3, what swines" it's natural development to keep 'adding' to a system when things don't go quite as planned, and re-releases are better than endless patches in the long run.

With regard to feeling safe. My computer doesn't function as a webserver, (but I use Apache locally and bring it up and down when I need it), and my computer gets its Internet connection through a (firewalled) Windows laptop connected peer-to-peer with this one, which makes it somewhat difficult to address this one directly. I feel safe because I know how difficult it would be for anyone to A. attack this PC, or B. get anything useful from it.

On Windows using IE 6 though, it doesn't matter what firewall you have if you hit a browser-object-gone-mad. I got a virus delivered by a script executed in a WMF file in Internet Explorer, and that was with AV and a firewall active.

I'm usually more worried about virus damage than cracker damage to be honest. There's always a question about the goodness of human nature in their immediate present, there's no question with a bit of mad script they wrote while in a in a bad mood and left all over the web.
Veteran Poster
MattEvans is offline Offline
1,091 posts
since Jul 2006
Jan 4th, 2007
0

Re: Microsoftzilla

Quote ...
but, as I use my personal computers for developing open-source software, listening to music, and chatting on forums, and I DO believe in the general goodness of people... I'm not all that concerned.
Worms don't care what they have. They just want another member for their zombie horde.
Junior Poster
Toba is offline Offline
192 posts
since Jun 2004
Jan 22nd, 2007
0

Re: Microsoftzilla

Leave everything and live in a cave. Much safer except if it's a bear dwelling. :eek:
Junior Poster in Training
Riv3n is offline Offline
56 posts
since Dec 2006
Message:
Previous Thread in Web Browsers Forum Timeline: What browser is better
Next Thread in Web Browsers Forum Timeline: Firefox vs Internet Explorer





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC