they probably need to slow down on making all this new stuff and add on and polish the old stuff. almost like a classic car. they're still the best
I agree ,but win7 is the polished version of win98 and xp and vista~And it still needs a little more polish!!!!!!!
caperjack
I hate 20 Questions
13,852 posts since Aug 2003
Reputation Points: 1,071
Solved Threads: 879
Skill Endorsements: 50
XP-SP3. I use it, it does everything that I require of it. Now in that I do not see a reason for change. Security? I just don't get hit, but then, I don't trawl the darker corners of the web. Change to Vista? Not going to happen. W7? Why?
gerbil
Industrious Poster
4,452 posts since May 2005
Reputation Points: 253
Solved Threads: 322
Skill Endorsements: 5
XP-SP3. Change to Vista? Not going to happen. W7? Why?
no reason to really that i can see to change ,had i not got it for free i would never went out and bought it !having said that i do like it better than winxp sp3 though
caperjack
I hate 20 Questions
13,852 posts since Aug 2003
Reputation Points: 1,071
Solved Threads: 879
Skill Endorsements: 50
I value your opinion on that, caper, so I can't see myself throwing away a good XP licence. Bill has a problem. Realistically, though, considering the extent of most peoples' use of a computer M$ should not expect to continually sell new, more powerful platforms; always some will be quite happy with what they have. Just as it is in the nature of others to over-extend by creeping specification.
gerbil
Industrious Poster
4,452 posts since May 2005
Reputation Points: 253
Solved Threads: 322
Skill Endorsements: 5
I value your opinion on that, caper, so I can't see myself throwing away a good XP licence. Bill has a problem. Realistically, though, considering the extent of most peoples' use of a computer M$ should not expect to continually sell new, more powerful platforms; always some will be quite happy with what they have. Just as it is in the nature of others to over-extend by creeping specification.
agree 100% with you comments
caperjack
I hate 20 Questions
13,852 posts since Aug 2003
Reputation Points: 1,071
Solved Threads: 879
Skill Endorsements: 50
I believe because of its stability, speed, hardware resources and hardware support. Window 7 doesn't support my Lexmark 3100 all in one printer especially the scanner. Visit to the Lexmark websiet doesn't help. The only letdown is the security. For those who have hardware constraint will happily use Window XP.
no drivers for win7 ,that's lexmarks doing ,they want you to buy a new printer
caperjack
I hate 20 Questions
13,852 posts since Aug 2003
Reputation Points: 1,071
Solved Threads: 879
Skill Endorsements: 50
i use win7 ,and like it very much ,went from xp to win7,skipped Vista, don't miss xp one little bit .
I got win7 Ultimate free for hosting a win7 coming out party last year and been using it since on my older computer ,some day i might get new tower to enjoy the full feature of win7
caperjack
I hate 20 Questions
13,852 posts since Aug 2003
Reputation Points: 1,071
Solved Threads: 879
Skill Endorsements: 50
Well good luck if you seriously think that an unsupported OS, which means no more security patches for vulnerabilities from Microsoft, is going to be secure. I have news for you, it isn't. A 'good' security suite (and good is very subjective in this context) and common sense will not help you when a zero day hits.
happygeek
veganarchist
28,353 posts since Mar 2006
Reputation Points: 1,603
Solved Threads: 90
Skill Endorsements: 71