caperjack
I hate 20 Questions
13,069 posts since Aug 2003
Reputation Points: 1,064
Solved Threads: 812
you welcome .i just found it with a google search ,will have to give it a better read tomorrow .
caperjack
I hate 20 Questions
13,069 posts since Aug 2003
Reputation Points: 1,064
Solved Threads: 812
"Speed: 3.0 MHz" ... that's your speed bottleneck, right there. Ida gone for one of the 3 GHz ones.... :)
Assuming disk space is not a problem, set a paging file of 1.5G. Got a second hard drive? Put it on that, first partition. Don't have one on the OS's disk as well, for XP one suffices.
gerbil
Industrious Poster
4,206 posts since May 2005
Reputation Points: 239
Solved Threads: 300
Sbilly, the reason for having a paging file on a drive other than your system drive is because it is [or can be] quicker.... while the drive heads on the sys drive are working with files the other drive's heads can be accessing the page file. Depending upon what your sys is doing/running it may have easily a million page faults an hour [a page fault is just the name for a page file access operation] - you can see the saving through having another drive holding the page file. Why have it on the outside of your second drive? Well, the outer tracks just hold more info [there are far more sectors on an outer track than an inner one [don't think of pie wedges]], so there is less head movement needed, they rotate under the head faster too. To get the page file onto the outer tracks you just make it the first partition on that hd. A 1.5 or 2G partition would suffice, but realistically speaking, if the drive already has a lot of files on it you may not consider it worthwhile moving them to make room for another partition.... but if you wished to play with that idea you would copy the files to another partition, and then rearrange your first partition with a tool like GParted Live CD. [my pf is on the outer of a second hd]. Or you could add a third drive, but only if you had other uses for it... not cost effective. And where would you get a 10G hd these days? Only from a junk reseller.... min wortthwhile drive is now 120/160GB... Another point, if on say a 120GB hd the first partition is just 5 or 10 GB there is almost no actual operational difference having the pf as the second partition...
Have fun.
gerbil
Industrious Poster
4,206 posts since May 2005
Reputation Points: 239
Solved Threads: 300
Sbilly, that would be a fine plan. Those drives do sound a little old so they may not be as fast as a modern drive but nevertheless your sys should show an improvement [although you likely will not notice it...]
gerbil
Industrious Poster
4,206 posts since May 2005
Reputation Points: 239
Solved Threads: 300