>Cloning and backing up, while involving the same process, can not be
>considered the same thing.
The process of backing up involves cloning to some degree. When you copy a file, you're cloning the bytes that represent the file. To a greater degree, a backup of a bootable software disc such as Windows XP implies disc cloning, as simply copying files on the disc would render the disc unbootable.
>a storage device like a server is what the EULA says.
Servers don't have hard drives?
>I think you may have copied that EULA from a multi licensed version
Instead of making wild guesses, you could... hmm, nah I'll just give you the link and let you see for yourself:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/eula/home.mspx
>They don't want you running two versions at once with the same
>license. Yes you can make a backup every company allows that. A
>backup in no way means backing it up to another hard drive that
>also runs it; it means putting it on a form of storage (like a cd or
>dvd) for later use in case of a emergency.
You're confused. Cloning hard drives doesn't imply running the hard drives concurrently on different machines, it means cloning -- just that. In many cases cloning is used for backups, in other cases it's used when upgrading hard drives (and the user doesn't want to reinstall from scratch).
Obviously if you don't own enough licenses for the number of running instances of XP, you're breaking the law, but like I've said already, the act of cloning isn't illegal. You could just use the XP install disc multiple times, and you'd be a criminal, plain and simple.