We did this at school and I believe you're supposed to install Linux first then install Windows XP. It worked just fine that way.
frenemy
Junior Poster in Training
70 posts since Jun 2005
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 5
Eh, if it's not working the way you want it there shouldn't be any harm. Tinkering around is fun, but time consuming.
frenemy
Junior Poster in Training
70 posts since Jun 2005
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 5
For other people that have problems creating a dual boot system, here is a nice article about partitioning in general and discusses dual boot hints/tips as well.
JoetjeF
Junior Poster in Training
67 posts since Jun 2005
Reputation Points: 15
Solved Threads: 3
They recommend a swap size of 768MB (1.5 times your RAM). Don't think you'll run into troubles though. Cannot you resize the swap partition using Partition Magic? Another solution could be to reduce the Windows partation and create an additional swap file in linux.
JoetjeF
Junior Poster in Training
67 posts since Jun 2005
Reputation Points: 15
Solved Threads: 3
Just a word of advice:
I'm not one to contradict anyone, but my experience has been quite the opposite of frenemy's. I've always installed Windows first, then install Linux. That way, the bootloader installation for Linux can detect the Windows installation (Hopefully), and add the appropriate entries to either menu.lst (for grub) or lilo.conf (for lilo)
alc6379
Cookie... That's it
2,820 posts since Dec 2003
Reputation Points: 186
Solved Threads: 147
Hello,
Windows first, then Linux. Microsoft has a view that it is the only thing on a computer, and it will try to use the whole drive, and not much else. Note how many systems have a C: and that's it...
Linux is designed to work with many partitions, and be flexible.
Christian
kc0arf
Posting Virtuoso
1,937 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 121
Solved Threads: 57