943,719 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
You are currently viewing page 1 of this multi-page discussion thread
Feb 26th, 2004
0

FAT32 vs. NTFS

Expand Post »
== I just need to know, I'm sure I'll be needing the info in the future. ==

Whenever I install win2k over win98/ME or I start on a clean install of win2k/XP, I always choose FAT32. This is mainly because I'm familiar with it, and NTFS can't be seen on win98/ME when I last had a dual boot operating system. What's the difference between NTFS and FAT32? which is better? should I use NTFS over FAT32 on a win2k/XP system? can I view/share files from a computer with NTFS using a computer with FAT32 (meaning win98/ME) over a network?

Please enlighten me...
Similar Threads
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 72
Solved Threads: 14
cyberkill(ed)
oalee is offline Offline
506 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 26th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

No win 98 or ME will not see the NTFS ,NTFS is more stable and the single file size can be upto 2Gigs .thats the main difference to my knowledge.one way or the other it wouldn't matter what one you use ,thats my opinion !
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 1056
Solved Threads: 792
I hate 20 Questions
caperjack is offline Offline
12,720 posts
since Aug 2003
Feb 26th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

so, based on your post, the only difference is that it can handle a single file up to the size of 2Gigs. what do you mean by more stable? stable in what way?
tnx.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 72
Solved Threads: 14
cyberkill(ed)
oalee is offline Offline
506 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 26th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

check this out.... NTFS vs FAT
this should be the info yous need your welcome :lol:
Reputation Points: 18
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster
RC_Razor is offline Offline
156 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 26th, 2004
0
Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS
Q: How does NTFS compared to FAT32 in Windows XP, and which is faster?

A: NTFS has much more built-in features than FAT, so generally it is a bit slower.

However it depends on many factors such as cluster size, average file size, etc.

For example, NTFS can keep small files inside MFT entry, so if the file size is less than cluster size, most likely it will be accessed much faster on NTFS than on FAT.

Generally speaking the performance of NTFS on large volumes is higher than performance of FAT32. NTFS performance on small volumes is lower than performance of FAT/FAT32.
Reputation Points: 18
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster
RC_Razor is offline Offline
156 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 26th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

Thank you very much for the info RC_Razor. what if my win2k crashes and I want to boot from a floppy? is there a bootdisk that can access an NTFS? if there is, then I'll probably have to repartition my HDD to NTFS since everything you've said sums up everything to the NTFS being way much better than FAT/FAT32.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 72
Solved Threads: 14
cyberkill(ed)
oalee is offline Offline
506 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 27th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

not sure about the boot disk disk but to add more information on the difference between the two.

The biggest difference comes when you network and share files over a LAN,

FAT: you can specify only down to which folder to share, and you can add a password to it, but anyone on the LAN who has the password can get into it.

NTFS: You can share files down to a specific file and not a whole directory and you can type in which computers can access it. So if you want no one else but a certain computer to read the file over the LAN, you can set it to do so, but not in FAT
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
Junior Poster in Training
Jra2003 is offline Offline
56 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 27th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

Quote originally posted by Jra2003 ...
FAT: you can specify only down to which folder to share, and you can add a password to it, but anyone on the LAN who has the password can get into it.
Can you do that to FAT32 on win2k? I mean, share a specific file?
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 72
Solved Threads: 14
cyberkill(ed)
oalee is offline Offline
506 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 27th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

no, on fat32, you can only narrow down to the directory, either the whole directory or nothing at all. NTFS adds more flexibility so you are allowed to specify which files to share. It isn't really dependent on the OS just format type.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
Junior Poster in Training
Jra2003 is offline Offline
56 posts
since Feb 2004
Feb 27th, 2004
0

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

things i didnt know ^ thanks... im also unsure about the boot disk .... and your welcome for the info...
Reputation Points: 18
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster
RC_Razor is offline Offline
156 posts
since Feb 2004

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
This thread is currently closed and is not accepting any new replies.
Previous Thread in Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum Timeline: DVD/CD Drive doesn't recognize inserted discs
Next Thread in Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum Timeline: Logging out of forum.





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC