943,708 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
You are currently viewing page 1 of this multi-page discussion thread
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

Expand Post »
I currently have two Hard discs on the same IDE channel thingy. One's 120GB, which I use for my current OS. On the Slave, I have a 40GB harddisc, which i don't really use at all.

It seems logical to me to move the Swap over to the 40GB one, especially as my Computer seems to have gotten very slow recently (would buy new RAM, but i'm looking for a cheapass solution here ). Are there any disadvantages to that?
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 63
Solved Threads: 6
Supreme Evil Overlord
Roberdin is offline Offline
282 posts
since Feb 2003
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

AdAware
Spybot Search & Destroy
A decent, up to date AntiVirus program
Uninstall unused or unwanted programs
Perform Disk Cleanup
Defrag


Then see if your Computer still seems to be as slow as it's 'gotten recently'.

You might even decide to pull that second, unused drive out of it!

Seriously, unless all that stuff has been attended to first, it's not worth considering moving functions.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
Grandad
Catweazle is offline Offline
3,826 posts
since Mar 2004
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

done all of them. No effect. And I need that second harddrive for when i want to test MS Longhorn.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 63
Solved Threads: 6
Supreme Evil Overlord
Roberdin is offline Offline
282 posts
since Feb 2003
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

Think about what IDE is...and the max transfer rate for it. Then think of what you're saying. Wouldn't it be better to keep it on the same drive? I had exp. with this before and I put my swap space for archlinux .5 on a 200MB drive and my main OS was on a 1GB drive. The 200MB drive died...so did my install of archlinux. That's a disadvantage as well...but if you're game for it, there isn't anything saying you cant do it. Does it make things better? No. Does it make them worse? No. Your choice.
TKS
Reputation Points: 108
Solved Threads: 18
Posting Pro in Training
TKS is offline Offline
470 posts
since Jan 2004
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

Actually, it does seem to have made a significant improvement - before when I played Rise of Nations over the net, it was very jittery, subject to constant freezes of varying length, most eventually threw me out of the game. However, I've just played it after donating a 3GB partition on my second drive to the swap (and removing the swap on my primary partition), and there were only a couple of freezes and none of any significant length at all.
But perhaps it was just a conincidence. I'll inform you of how this turns out in the long run sometime.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 63
Solved Threads: 6
Supreme Evil Overlord
Roberdin is offline Offline
282 posts
since Feb 2003
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

How much RAM and how much swap are you talking about here?
Reputation Points: 87
Solved Threads: 12
Posting Whiz in Training
i686-linux is offline Offline
208 posts
since Mar 2004
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

a terrible 256MB ram and now 3GB swap.

But before you all gut me for having a huge and probably mostly empty swap (), I've decided that a format and reinstall is probably the best solution anyway.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 63
Solved Threads: 6
Supreme Evil Overlord
Roberdin is offline Offline
282 posts
since Feb 2003
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

Quote originally posted by Roberdin ...
I currently have two Hard discs on the same IDE channel thingy. One's 120GB, which I use for my current OS. On the Slave, I have a 40GB harddisc, which i don't really use at all.

It seems logical to me to move the Swap over to the 40GB one, especially as my Computer seems to have gotten very slow recently (would buy new RAM, but i'm looking for a cheapass solution here ). Are there any disadvantages to that?
Actually there are multiple advantages. Consider this: putting the swap on a separate physical hard drive means that the program/data file system and virtual-memory filesystem are kept apart, for the most part. Especially with 256 MB or less, this reduces "thrashing"--excess head movement caused by system contention for the same physical drive. Not only that, it keeps the program/data and virtual-memory queues separated, as well--all of which can lead to improved overall system performance.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 149
Solved Threads: 45
Practically a Posting Shark
TallCool1 is offline Offline
865 posts
since May 2003
Apr 5th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

The biggest benefit of all, however, is to be gained from setting minimum and maximum sizes for the swap file to the same value, thus eliminating fragmentation.

Another consideration is that if the second drive is a slower one than the main system drive, performance improvements will be offset by the slower drive performance.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
Grandad
Catweazle is offline Offline
3,826 posts
since Mar 2004
Apr 6th, 2004
0

Re: Virtual Memory - Better on Seperate Disk?

it's better on a seperate disk on a seperate channel, but virt mem isn't brilliant, you probably want ot get some more ram if you are Regularly using up large amounts of virt mem :/
Reputation Points: 38
Solved Threads: 9
Posting Whiz in Training
suRoot is offline Offline
210 posts
since Apr 2004

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum Timeline: What happened to my settings?
Next Thread in Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum Timeline: How delete failed W2000 installation





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC