943,607 Members | Top Members by Rank

  • Networking Discussion Thread
  • Unsolved
  • Views: 652
  • Networking RSS
Nov 23rd, 2008
0

Confused with question on RFC826 (APR)

Expand Post »
Question: Highlight the part of the algorithm detailed in RFC826 which makes Arp Poison Routing (APR) possible and briefly explain your reasoning.

I am not 100% sure on this question, what is it asking for? I have read the document RFC826 but still confused.

Does it mean this this algorithm?

Quote ...
?Do I have the hardware type in ar$hrd?
Yes: (almost definitely)
[optionally check the hardware length ar$hln]
?Do I speak the protocol in ar$pro?
Yes:
[optionally check the protocol length ar$pln]
Merge_flag := false
If the pair <protocol type, sender protocol address> is
already in my translation table, update the sender
hardware address field of the entry with the new
information in the packet and set Merge_flag to true.
?Am I the target protocol address?
Yes:
If Merge_flag is false, add the triplet <protocol type,
sender protocol address, sender hardware address> to
the translation table.
?Is the opcode ares_op$REQUEST? (NOW look at the opcode!!)
Yes:
Swap hardware and protocol fields, putting the local
hardware and protocol addresses in the sender fields.
Set the ar$op field to ares_op$REPLY
Send the packet to the (new) target hardware address on
the same hardware on which the request was received.
Source: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc826.html

Thanks
Last edited by scottyscotty19; Nov 23rd, 2008 at 5:47 pm.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
scottyscotty19 is offline Offline
22 posts
since Nov 2008
Nov 24th, 2008
0

Re: Confused with question on RFC826 (APR)

Anybody have any ideas?

I have done all the other 19 questions, but I am still stuck on this one.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
scottyscotty19 is offline Offline
22 posts
since Nov 2008

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Networking Forum Timeline: Network question
Next Thread in Networking Forum Timeline: 'Big Brother' Gives, Takes Away





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC