944,116 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
Dec 7th, 2006
0

256MB vs. 512MB?

Expand Post »
What is the benefit of a 512MB video card over one that has 256MB?
I'll be running Vista, designing graphics and have a many applications
open at once. However, there won't be any large amount of animations or
gaming.

Thanks
Similar Threads
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
KenTs is offline Offline
3 posts
since Dec 2006
Dec 7th, 2006
0

Re: 256MB vs. 512MB?

Unless you want to play Doom III with these unnaturally large textures they added for players with 512Mb graphics, then no, there is no known benefit of having more than 256Mb (happens to be the maximum any other game can occupy on highest settings). If you're running multiple applications, that would fall directly into system RAM, not the graphic card's.

Anymahoo, you're designing graphics... so no difference. It would take such a giant collection of polygons and textures in a single instance that even a 128Mb card would respectively be difficult to fill.

For economic purposes, stick with the 256Mb.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 2
Posting Whiz in Training
BeastOverlordH6 is offline Offline
283 posts
since Jun 2005

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Monitors, Displays and Video Cards Forum Timeline: ATI Radeon 7000 flickering at high refresh and resolution rates
Next Thread in Monitors, Displays and Video Cards Forum Timeline: LCD backlight Problem





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC