954,336 Members — Technology Publication meets Social Media
Username:
Password:
Lost login information?
Have something to say? Contribute New Article Reply to this Article

physical cores vs virtual

Hi. I know what a physical and virtual cores are but in terms of performance is there any difference between a physical core and a virtual core?
Lets say you had two processors and for the purpose of this example they were identical except one was a quad core without hyper threading and the other was a dual core with hyper threading, would they be equal? Thanks

bryann
Newbie Poster
17 posts since Apr 2010
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
 

No, they are not the same.
Benchmarks with and without hyperthreading show a difference of between 5 and 30 per cent. (depending on the application)

In your example the true quad would be significantly faster.

prixat
Newbie Poster
17 posts since Jul 2009
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 5
 

All Hyperthreading really does is queue up more jobs to be run on the cores. In any case, more physical cores will be a better way to go.

If you really wanted to compare, you'd compare between the same chip, with Hyperthreading, and without. But, YMMV, as some applications run better WITHOUT Hyperthreading. Go figure...

alc6379
Cookie... That's it
Team Colleague
2,820 posts since Dec 2003
Reputation Points: 186
Solved Threads: 147
 

thanks for the replies that cleared it up for me

bryann
Newbie Poster
17 posts since Apr 2010
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
 

This question has already been solved

Post: Markdown Syntax: Formatting Help
You