943,925 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
  • Storage Discussion Thread
  • Marked Solved
  • Views: 1338
  • Storage RSS
Nov 7th, 2008
0

Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

Expand Post »
Hi,

If this observation is correct:

If two drives (preferably of equal size are set up as a RAID 1 configuration all data is mirrored between the two drives. If an error is detected on one drive the system keeps going with data from the mirrored good sector and the error is corrected on the damaged mirrored sector. The down side is that you only have half the storage capacity of the drives.

It sounds like it would be worthwhile to keep those old hard drives from broken down machines or when a new larger drive is added to your computer and set them up in an enclosure as a RAID system.

I have two spare drives now an 80GB and a 60GB of 2001 vintage -neither drive had caused any problems when I replaced them but I decided to replace them just in case.
Similar Threads
Reputation Points: 6
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster
ggeoff is offline Offline
169 posts
since Aug 2007
Nov 12th, 2008
0

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

That observation is somewhat misleading.

Two drives can be setup in a RAID setting for mirroring (RAID1, I believe). All data is mirrored on both drives, so it would take 2x Xgb to store Xgb. (the values are not added together).

If there is a failure of one drive, it is possible to replace that drive and rebuild the data.

Mirroring (RAID1) allows a single disk failure without interruption and the capability of rebuilding the entire array.

Striping (RAID0) takes N drives but allows for zero failure. In this arrangement, the drives' capacities are added together (Nx Xgb = N(X)). The draw back is tolerance - a single drive dies and the entire array is down with data loss.

I am unsure how RAID arrays behave when the drives are not the same capacity.
Last edited by Stylish; Nov 12th, 2008 at 2:28 pm.
Reputation Points: 44
Solved Threads: 19
Junior Poster
Stylish is offline Offline
148 posts
since May 2007
Nov 12th, 2008
0

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by Stylish ...
That observation is somewhat misleading.

Two drives can be setup in a RAID setting for mirroring (RAID1, I believe). All data is mirrored on both drives, so it would take 2x Xgb to store Xgb. (the values are not added together).

If there is a failure of one drive, it is possible to replace that drive and rebuild the data.

Mirroring (RAID1) allows a single disk failure without interruption and the capability of rebuilding the entire array.

Striping (RAID0) takes N drives but allows for zero failure. In this arrangement, the drives' capacities are added together (Nx Xgb = N(X)). The draw back is tolerance - a single drive dies and the entire array is down with data loss.

I am unsure how RAID arrays behave when the drives are not the same capacity.
You seem to be mirroring my post Stylish! Anyway "that drive" does not need to be replaced. I have already stated that the drives are preferably the same size -as otherwise the capacity of the larger drive is reduced. Which would be wasteful if one drive was 60GB and the other was 120GB. But to simplify:

The proposal is that a couple of old drives can still be used with little risk if they are set up as RAID 0 as if a fault develops the software heals the error on one of the drives whilst the drives are still in use.

I am expecting someone to suggest whether that is realistic or not. And if not why not. disk enclosures aren't cheap and what manages them? Maybe an old computer can be used as extra storage -they are cheap enough. My two redundant hard drives one of 60GB and the other of 80GB are, apart from their age - circa 2001 still serviceable, so why chuck them in the recycling bin?
Reputation Points: 6
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster
ggeoff is offline Offline
169 posts
since Aug 2007
Nov 13th, 2008
1

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by ggeoff ...
... The proposal is that a couple of old drives can still be used with little risk ...
A seven year old disk drive? I would trust it to be useful for testing and for educational/training purposes. But given a choice between using old drives for my system and data and buying new ones, I would buy new ones. Of course, I'd then take the old ones apart and keep the magnets. Those little magnets are pretty darn strong!

A seven year old disk drive is likely to be approaching the end of its life. The probability of it developing read and write errors is much higher. The probability of it having problems with its electronics is much higher. Seven years of heat/cool and power on/off cycles will have taken their toll.

Find smartmontools somewhere and check the drives' status. You might be surprised at what you find.
Reputation Points: 51
Solved Threads: 35
Posting Whiz in Training
Fest3er is offline Offline
238 posts
since Aug 2007
Nov 18th, 2008
0

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

Like Fest3er said, if you decide not to use them, at least disassemble them for the magnets (rare earth - neodymium magnets), and the incredible strong and shiny coasters, I mean platters inside. Well worth the effort. I mean who else can say they have a set of shiny coasters with holes in em, and fridge magnets that can lift the refrigerator...LOL. ~Mav
Reputation Points: 13
Solved Threads: 4
Junior Poster in Training
Maverick223 is offline Offline
73 posts
since Dec 2007
Nov 18th, 2008
1

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

yeah i disasembled my dead Hitatchi/IBM Deskstar once and it had wierd glass platters. You could see why it had died, the magnetic material had actually worn off of them and turned to dust. There was a groove where the head had hit it at 7000 rpm and disintegrated lol.
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 1784
Solved Threads: 574
Moderator
jbennet is offline Offline
16,520 posts
since Apr 2005
Nov 24th, 2008
0

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by jbennet ...
yeah i disasembled my dead Hitatchi/IBM Deskstar once and it had wierd glass platters. You could see why it had died, the magnetic material had actually worn off of them and turned to dust. There was a groove where the head had hit it at 7000 rpm and disintegrated lol.
Thats pretty cool (not that it died), I have heard of newer HDDs using glass and ceramics but I have never seen them myself (though I think I have one...A Samsung Spinpoint 750Gb). I have taken many HDDs apart and only found what I believe to be a silicon-aluminum alloy. They prove to be very rigid and strong, but reasonably lightweight; perfect material for coasters.
Reputation Points: 13
Solved Threads: 4
Junior Poster in Training
Maverick223 is offline Offline
73 posts
since Dec 2007
Nov 24th, 2008
1

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

This was pretty old. It was like 20-40gb in size and was an upgrade for an NT4 box (found NT4 wouldnt ket you have a C bigger than like 4gb or 8gb or something, so i upgraded to win2k) so maybe early 2000s, perhaps it was ahead of its time, which is why it died.

Best hard drives are server ones seemingly. Ive got some 2.1gb (old) hotswappable 7200rpm (mush have been blazingly fast 'back in the day') SCSI drives in a compaq server and it runs 24/7 for like the 6+ years i have had it lol (before that it ran for like up to 5 years with someone else). Only one of the three disks has died which is real impressive.
Last edited by jbennet; Nov 24th, 2008 at 3:28 am.
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 1784
Solved Threads: 574
Moderator
jbennet is offline Offline
16,520 posts
since Apr 2005
Nov 24th, 2008
0

Re: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?

Hi Guys

Sounds like that I could make some sculpture from them after disassembly. So I won't through them away. Strong Magnets? that's intriguing.

Geoff
Reputation Points: 6
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster
ggeoff is offline Offline
169 posts
since Aug 2007

This thread is solved

Either the thread starter or a moderator has marked this thread as solved. You can most likely trust the responses and answers given. There is most likely no reason for any further responses to be posted here. If you have a related question, please start a new thread in this forum instead.

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Storage Forum Timeline: RAID 1 Question
Next Thread in Storage Forum Timeline: WD External Hard Drive





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC