943,739 Members | Top Members by Rank

Hardware and Software > PC Hardware > Storage > RAID 1 Question
Ad:
  • Storage Discussion Thread
  • Unsolved
  • Views: 1179
  • Storage RSS
Permalink
Nov 13th, 2008
0

RAID 1 Question

Expand Post »
I creating a file server for a client, I want to set up RAID 1. However, I'd like HD0 (aprox. 2 40-80 GB drives) for the OS. I'd like to set up another HD, HD1 (2 1TB drives for file storage) seperate of the first RAID 1. The files that need to be stored will be large graphic files. This will be my first SCSI - RAID configuration I have ever done, so please forgive my ignorance.

My question is, do I need 2 SCSI controllers to accomplist this? Or can I set up 2 RAID 1 Mirror arrays on 1 SCSI card.

My plan is to back up the HD0 and HD1 (1 TB drive) to off premise location using the Internet via VPN routers.

Any additional information or advice is welcome. Thank you.
Similar Threads
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
Moehang is offline Offline
2 posts
since Nov 2008
Permalink
Nov 20th, 2008
0

Re: RAID 1 Question

Sorry for the slow response, I don't believe many folks here know much about SCSI RAID. I have a little basic knowledge because I have been investigating using a SCSI RAID controller for a similar application; I would like to use RAID 5 for the primary 3 HDDs and RAID 1 for the secondary storage HDDs using SATA. From what I have found you may do this if you get the right RAID card, but make sure to check the manufacturer first. Best of luck...Mav.
Reputation Points: 13
Solved Threads: 4
Junior Poster in Training
Maverick223 is offline Offline
73 posts
since Dec 2007
Permalink
Nov 20th, 2008
0

Re: RAID 1 Question

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by Moehang ...
I creating a file server for a client, I want to set up RAID 1. However, I'd like HD0 (aprox. 2 40-80 GB drives) for the OS.
what exactly are you going to use for the OS? 2x 80Gb drives in Raid1, or did I not get you correctly?

Quote ...
I'd like to set up another HD, HD1 (2 1TB drives for file storage) seperate of the first RAID 1. The files that need to be stored will be large graphic files. This will be my first SCSI - RAID configuration I have ever done, so please forgive my ignorance.
for large files, raid1 is a bit too slow. you will be better off with a few drives in raid5 or raid6 (start of with at least 5 drives to see performance increase), and for large files you need to use a large buffer size, adaptive read ahead and writeback policies.

Quote ...
My question is, do I need 2 SCSI controllers to accomplist this? Or can I set up 2 RAID 1 Mirror arrays on 1 SCSI card.
if you have one SCSI controller that you can connect all the drives to, it will be enough.
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 183
Solved Threads: 89
Posting Virtuoso
DimaYasny is offline Offline
1,772 posts
since Jan 2007
Permalink
Nov 20th, 2008
0

Re: RAID 1 Question

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by Maverick223 ...
Sorry for the slow response, I don't believe many folks here know much about SCSI RAID. I have a little basic knowledge because I have been investigating using a SCSI RAID controller for a similar application; I would like to use RAID 5 for the primary 3 HDDs and RAID 1 for the secondary storage HDDs using SATA. From what I have found you may do this if you get the right RAID card, but make sure to check the manufacturer first. Best of luck...Mav.
the usual practice is to set up raid1 for the OS, and a striped raid (5/5E/6/10/50/etc) for the data
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 183
Solved Threads: 89
Posting Virtuoso
DimaYasny is offline Offline
1,772 posts
since Jan 2007
Permalink
Nov 20th, 2008
0

Re: RAID 1 Question

First off, thank you for your replies.

Yes, I'm planing on using 2x 80GB HDD in RAID1 for the OS. Then 2x 1TB HDD in RAID1 for file storage. There will not my clients accessing the file server at any one time (2 workstations either retrieving or saving files at any giving time, although probably not at the same time) Do you still think I should use RAID 5 or 6 for the file storage? I don't think the client wants to spend the money for all those HDDs.

BTW, I'm thinking purchasing a Motherboard that supports SATA RAID instead of buying a SCSI card. (4x SATA)
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
Moehang is offline Offline
2 posts
since Nov 2008
Permalink
Nov 21st, 2008
0

Re: RAID 1 Question

the onboard controllers are what we call fakeraid. they are basically almost the same as software based raid, only working through a driver. that makes the raid config not transparent to the OS.

a real raid controller will have it's own cpu, a battery and a memory dimm, and all the parity computation will be performed on the card, not by the main CPU of the system
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 183
Solved Threads: 89
Posting Virtuoso
DimaYasny is offline Offline
1,772 posts
since Jan 2007
Permalink
Nov 23rd, 2008
0

Re: RAID 1 Question

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by DimaYasny ...
the usual practice is to set up raid1 for the OS, and a striped raid (5/5E/6/10/50/etc) for the data
I think you may have misunderstood me when I said primary, I plan on using it for all programs and data that requires speed. Again thanks Dima for the help in my thread. Do you really think that RAID 5 needs 5+ drives to be appreciably faster (planned on 3)?

Additionally I have to agree with Dima about the RAID controller, I don't believe mobos typically support more than one array (unless it is a server mobo) and they tend to be a little inefficient (slower). However you may be better served by a good SATA RAID card, with onboard RAM to increase the speed.
Reputation Points: 13
Solved Threads: 4
Junior Poster in Training
Maverick223 is offline Offline
73 posts
since Dec 2007
Permalink
Nov 24th, 2008
1

Re: RAID 1 Question

1. yes, you need many drives, so I would go for several smaller drives instead of 3 large ones. also the raid policy set in the controller is important for performance
2. mobo controllers support several raid drives, but they are not really raid controllers in the full meaning of the word. you might as well use software raid instead (especially under linux - it is much better)

in striped raid configs you need several drives to increase performance, but make sure you don't have too many. i.e. in raid5 6 drives are fast, 8 drives are optimal, and 10 drives are a bit of a slowdown, so you need to go for raid 50 instead (what you would usually get in large SAN environments)
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 183
Solved Threads: 89
Posting Virtuoso
DimaYasny is offline Offline
1,772 posts
since Jan 2007

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Storage Forum Timeline: RAID 5?
Next Thread in Storage Forum Timeline: Is it worth keeping an old hard drive?





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC