you should just mod one of the alienware pcs they have some sick pc's for running games and they have announced that they have a comp that runs a pt4 4ghz processor.
mikeandike22
Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
1,496 posts since May 2004
Reputation Points: 33
Solved Threads: 19
i donnu get a site that offers something useful and add a paypal doante link to it or just do wat my bro did and put the donate link in his sig. Or mow lawns and shovel snow my bro makes like $300 on a good snow day.
6ghz must be really unstable even overclocking from 3.2 to 3.6 could be unstable on some machines.
mikeandike22
Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
1,496 posts since May 2004
Reputation Points: 33
Solved Threads: 19
OK, on topic, eh?
That's a tad light on for a modern gaming rig. Matter of fact, looking at the display card chosen it's a LOT light on!
AMD Athlon64 is currently the best choice for gaming, not Intel. It'll do just as well as the Pentium for Photoshopping as well. Socket 754 is good enough and keeps costs down. Look for a decent and affordable Socket 754 NForce3 250 chipset motherboard, and an Athlon64 3200+ if you can fit it in the budget. Match it with at least 512Mb of PC3200 RAM, and 1Gb is better. Being cooler running than the latest Pentiums, it won't need either water cooling or a 120mm case fan ;)
Display card is the most important factor for games and you shouldn't accept anything less than a Radeon 9600XT or an NVidia FX5900XT bare minimum! A Radeon 9800 Pro is still a decent card and is an affordable option also.
The Athlon64 for socket 754 probably won't go much past 3200+, but the addition of a better display card later on would keep that rig gaming for a long time to come anyway, so it wouldn't matter.
If funds are too tight, you could drop that back to an Athlon64 2800+ and have room for a processor upgrade later as well (although I wouldn't bother personally) and it'd still belt the piss outta that Pentium 2.6GHz ;)
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
You're living in the past with that idea that Intel Pentium is better for gaming. the Athlon64 processors beat their Pentium equivalents in games performance hands down ;)
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
You're a rather rude Young Teck, I think. :confused:
Do you actually know the difference between an Athlon XP processor and an Athlon64 processor?
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
im pretty sure the 64 stands for 64 bit wich is the best and most expensive type of processor you can get.
mikeandike22
Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
1,496 posts since May 2004
Reputation Points: 33
Solved Threads: 19
best maybe for games, p4 with HT is the beter one for multi-tasking.
Not quite right.More RAM is the thing which improves multi-tasking, not really the processor at all.
The hyper-threading (simulation of dual-processors) of the more recent Pentium 4 processors is of benefit only to those types of software application which are written to make use of it. Very demanding tasks like real-time video editing and the serving of huge amounts of data from a database for example. The type of computing tasks most commonly associated with Workstation computers rather than desktop computers. Everyday computing applications and PC games make no use of the feature at all.
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
Especially when their performance doesn't really exceed that of their much cheaper Athlon64 conterparts ;)
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149