OK, at least you are being civil about the whole thing.
Now care to respond to my five points on page one?
Peace,
Gene
I'll take on your 5 points.1. Apple's agreement with AT&T, depending on whether the original provisions have been changed, may expire between now and 2012.
Based on court documents the contract is 5 years long. (As of 2007) Unless, like you said, the contract has been altered/extended and given that both parties meet the requirements outlined in the contract. The truth is, nobody REALLY knows the current/true length of the contract. Your guess is as good as any other. Though my guess would be, AFTER January 1, 2012.. not between now and 2012.
2. After that, there's nothing to prevent Apple from seeking other providers in the USA, and no indication they'd maintain the exclusive.
Again, you are taking a guess here and I'd agree with you. Why would they want to remain exclusive to a single provider? AT&T could make an offer Apple can't refuse, but I'm doubtful at this point.
3. It's clear that AT&T is also overwhelmed with the iPhone, since it uses more network resources than other smart phones. In saying that, there's no evidence Verizon Wireless would fare any better. I've had severe problems with Verizon's customer service and won't return to them, even if they can offer a superior network.
AT&T has had 3 years to upgrade it's network to take on the new challenges stemming from the increase in smart phones. Instead of resolving the problem and growing with the trend, they've decided to cap it and charge MORE for using it. Verizon's solution is the upgrade of it's already superior 3G network.
Now, to address your "...there's no evidence Verizon Wireless would fare any better." statement. The evidence is VERY clear whom could handle it's customers better.
I. Verizon's 3G coverage is 5x higher than AT&T's.
(Source: http://revolver360.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/mapforthat.jpg )
II. AT&T Holds the #1 spot for MOST complaints filed with the FCC amongst wireless carriers. Verizon is #7.
(Source: http://www.fcc.gov/ )
III. In 2010, J.D. Power ranked AT&T as the lowest in a Wireless Customer Care Performance Study. Verizon was #1.
(Source: http://www.jdpower.com/Telecom/ratings/wireless-customer-care-ratings-%28volume-1%29 )
IV. In a 2010 study, J.D. Power ranks AT&T as the lowest in wireless call quality across ALL of the USA. Verizon ranked #1 in almost all the areas of the USA.
(Source: http://www.jdpower.com/Telecom/ratings/wireless-call-quality-ratings-%28volume-1%29 )
V. A 2009 study by Consumer Reports finds that AT&T ranks lowest in Overall Cell-Phone Service. Again, Verizon is #1.
(Source: http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/12/crBIG.jpg )
I could go on but I'll stop here. It's conclusive which network is best at handling the upsurge in data usage/network resources. Which, by the way is a 2-part problem. It's not just data usage causing the problem, but the way smart phones interact with the networks.
4. At present, Verizon cannot offer the same features on the iPhone with their CDMA network, such as being able to take a phone call and check your email or surf the net at the same time. This may require changes to Verizon's network architecture, or you'll have to wait for LTE to be deployed.
You are correct here. The CDMA network is.. ehhh. I don't know where they stand on the LTE deployment. It was supposed to have been completed by the end of 2010. Who knows?
5. Other providers are apt to also put caps on bandwidth as demands increase. According to AT&T, only 2% of their customers have problems with the current maximum of 2GB.
Please provide a source for "Other providers are apt to also put caps on bandwidth..". My findings are to the contrary as other networks are upgrading.. not charging more and capping. I still get unlimited for $30/month myself. I'm happy that I never have to worry about going over. After we all start using the iPhone 4.. with it's HD Video recording and 5MP camera.. let's just see how "happy" customers are when they go over that 2gb limit.