954,353 Members — Technology Publication meets Social Media
Username:
Password:
Lost login information?
Have something to say? Contribute New Article Reply to this Article

G Analytics take foooorever!

Who besides me thinks that Google Analytics' downfall will be that it takes way to long to process and display data?

cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
Administrator
19,421 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
 

I agree, do you know of any other great tracking sites other than google analytics.

I do like the analytics though because its no indept, once it loads its easy to navigate through and understand.

We use it to track our sites now, so hopefully they can make it better rather than it going downhill!

KeyDegree
Light Poster
45 posts since Aug 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
 

Also the data is not reliable what I observed, best to look the stats through your control panel- Awstats & Analog.

bobchrist
Posting Pro in Training
456 posts since Jan 2007
Reputation Points: 17
Solved Threads: 10
 

Hmm interesting I will have to look into another option for tracking my websites. Thanks for the tips!!

KeyDegree
Light Poster
45 posts since Aug 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
 
Also the data is not reliable what I observed, best to look the stats through your control panel- Awstats & Analog.


I agree,

beamup
Light Poster
34 posts since Aug 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

cscgal,

I tried Google analytics a couple times and I got disappointed by seeing inaccurate results...
I compared the results with the stats of server logs..Google analytics shows way lower number...
It may be related to loading the Google script while loading the page........

Yes I agree with you on Analytics being slow .........

TroyM
Newbie Poster
24 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

What would you say is a better yet comparable sustitute?

Estreetloans
Junior Poster in Training
50 posts since Mar 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

There are bunch of application out there can read your server log files to show your stats.. Almost all Unix servers comes with one or two of them.. If you do not like how they look, you can try some paid tools...

TroyM
Newbie Poster
24 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

I find that Google Analytics data is MORE reliable than server logs because, since it's initiated with JavaScript, it only tracks real users and not any of the bots or spiders.

cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
Administrator
19,421 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
 

Why not try the Submit Express on which you can track the traffics and keywords for your site.

I agree, do you know of any other great tracking sites other than google analytics.

I do like the analytics though because its no indept, once it loads its easy to navigate through and understand.

We use it to track our sites now, so hopefully they can make it better rather than it going downhill!

guinanie
Junior Poster
101 posts since Jul 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

Does anyone else have any experience with Submit Express? I am open to new ideas/services, but I would assume ask the experts here before I dedicate any amount of effort. Thanks!

Estreetloans
Junior Poster in Training
50 posts since Mar 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

I know the company from meeting them at SES conventions, but I've never worked with them at a business level.

cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
Administrator
19,421 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
 
Does anyone else have any experience with Submit Express? I am open to new ideas/services, but I would assume ask the experts here before I dedicate any amount of effort. Thanks!


What service of that company are you asking about .. if it is "search engine submission" service, I do not recommend it....Do it yourself....

Thanks

TroyM
Newbie Poster
24 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

it just takes a day and in my opinion its okay , i used to use statcounter before, it displays stats 'as they happen' but you gotta pay to store details of more than 500 visitors!..don't think that's a good deal,i guess google is doing this so that it displays a full day's stats at once instead of it changing throughout the day, it's just 24 hours old only anyway...

A_member
Junior Poster in Training
70 posts since Sep 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 2
 
I find that Google Analytics data is MORE reliable than server logs because, since it's initiated with JavaScript, it only tracks real users and not any of the bots or spiders.

"JavaScript, it only tracks real user" But it can not track real user who disabled "Java Script" on their browser..

Plus Google analytic is not real time..

Thanks

TroyM
Newbie Poster
24 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 
I find that Google Analytics data is MORE reliable than server logs because, since it's initiated with JavaScript, it only tracks real users and not any of the bots or spiders.

I agree. The reason it appears to show lower numbers is because it shows actual, real visitors. Other scripts like webalizer or WP Slimstat will show any requests to your web server. If you're getting crawled by search engines, that can be a lot of hits/visits that really don't exist.

There's a chance it under-reports because people have javascript turned off, or bounce away from the page before it loads... but for the most part I find it far more reliable than other scripts. I love it.

I'd rather know how manypeople are coming to my site than revel in the number of search engine spiders I can entertain... =)

- Walkere

Walkere
Junior Poster in Training
57 posts since Jan 2008
Reputation Points: 29
Solved Threads: 5
 

This article has been dead for over three months

Post: Markdown Syntax: Formatting Help
You