How high is the risk of being penalized? Glad I only started submitting on 10'ish directories.. So articles are a no-no now?
I'm not sure "penalized" is the right word. Perhaps "ignored" is better. Google doesn't want duplicate content in its index, so it tries to figure out which site holds the original text.
You can see this clearly with the case of DMOZ. The DMOZ link directory (and Google's "powered by DMOZ" pages) do OK in the search results. However, the thousands & thousands of sites that mirror DMOZ basically don't even appear in search results. Same thing with Wikipedia. Articles on Wikipedia rank quite high in Google's search results. But the thousands of mirror sites don't appear at all.
Google will try to do this with your article. It will see that the same article appears on 20 sites, and it will decide upon a "victor" to retain PageRank. The other 19 sites will not rank well or at all for that article. Note that I don't believe the sites gethurt -- Google does not blacklist them or apply a negative score to the other pages on the sites. It simply ignores the duplicate page.
What this means is that, if you want a decent strategy that saves time, you'll probably only bother with the top, high-traffic article sites. Get that article into maybe the top 5, and hope you get high PageRank from one, and a bit of traffic from the others. There wouldn't be much reason to bother with a no-name article repository, because you don't want some low-PR site to be Google's "victor," thus relegating your article to bad search results. And you won't get traffic from those sites, anyway.
Articles work. But past a certain point, don't expect a lot of PageRank. So only submit to the best (which also has the nice side-benefit of saving you time chasing diminishing returns).
-Tony
aboyd
Junior Poster in Training
57 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 11
Solved Threads: 0
Submitting articles to various sites in your industry with your website address in the credits can definitely not only help your search engine ranking, but get you some targeted visitors, credibility, and contacts. A good article will also earn you respect in your field.
cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
19,421 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
I agree, syndication is key. What is a "resource box" or is that just a metaphor?
cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
19,421 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
If you do that, your first instinct might be to post good articles on your site and crappy articles on other people's sites. I mean, why spend the time giving THEM nice spiderable unique content? The thing is that if you do that, your name and reputation, and your website's reputation, become associated with the crappy articles all the same. So post good quality articles you don't mind having your name on everywhere, but do save the absolute best for yourself.
cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
19,421 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
yea this is the best man go for it
010081
Junior Poster in Training
82 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
I've had very good luck with articles. They generate a fair amount of traffic when they are first published, and often generate traffic when others look for them. Plus the money the site pays for the article is nice too.
Isn't it usually against the contract to submit your article to more than one? The contract I sign when the editor and I agree on a topic states that they own the article for a set amount of time usually.
I write about software development mostly. The sites I use for articles are devx.com, informit.com, developer.com, gamelan.com.
JeffHeaton
Junior Poster in Training
58 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 12
Solved Threads: 0