Google is pretty green I think - please see www google com /green

Hmm... green search too eh?

Re Copenhagen,
These kind of gatherings generate a mass-hysteria for a common cause.

Like George Orwell’s Animal Farm book, where mass hysteria meant one pig
overtrumping another in self-sacrificial willingness
- except here it’s always someone else (not the politicians) who has
to make the sacrifice…
“We must all cut down to save the planet”

There is no energy shortage
(given renewable/nuclear development possibilities, with CO2 emission
limits set as deemed necessary)
and consumers – not politicians – PAY for energy and how they wish to use it.
Notice: If there WAS an energy shortage, its price rise would
– limit people using it anyway, and make renewable energy more attractive
– make energy efficient products more attractive to buy.
No need to legislate for it.
SNIP

And since when do light bulbs, TV sets etc give out any CO2 gas?
Not like cars.
And cars are taxed.
They could of course tax the bulbs etc, and lower the tax on energy
efficient alternatives.
Governments make money on the reduced sales, they can pay for CO2
emission processing and renewable energy, and consumers keep choice.
Taxes are unjustified, but better for all than bans.

Few seem to know about the industrial politics behind the supposedly
environmentally justified bans
SNIP

In Copenhagen at the Climate summit they are using so many private planes and limos that they will leave a carbon footprint the size of a small nation. Today a political action group put out a wanted poster for the head of the US Chamber of Commerce because he questioned global warming. And two weeks ago a mass of e-mails were released that show that one of the leading proponents of the global warming hysteria was doing everything possible to deny, cover up and hide evidence that shows that maybe global warming/cooling/whatever is a load of crap. Someone please tell me what the least green search engine is so I can use it!

I just couldn't understand the logic and idea behind that? why not to use google ?

While I believe there is a need for conservation in the forms of protected areas and more intelligent ways of accessing and using the natural resources available, I view the whole Global Warming Hysteria as a bunch of crap. In the 70's Time magazine ran a cover story on global cooling and thirty years later they run a cover story on global warming. The two articles were essentially the same but with reference to cooling replaced with reference to warming. The same week Al Gore received the Nobel Prize for his work on climate change a british court ruled that of the 10 items he focused on in his Oscar winning movie, 7 were completely false and the other 3 were true but blown completely out of proportion based on the evidence available.
Use Google, the polar bears could care less.