943,985 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
You are currently viewing page 1 of this multi-page discussion thread
Nov 25th, 2005
0

Rel=Nofollow

Expand Post »
Do you recommend using the rel=nofollow tag on links that are member-submitted, such as from a blog or forum?
Similar Threads
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Nov 27th, 2005
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

My opinion is no. Crap links should be weeded out by human editors / moderators.
Reputation Points: 11
Solved Threads: 1
Posting Whiz in Training
jewboy is offline Offline
252 posts
since Feb 2005
Nov 27th, 2005
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

But human editors are ... well ... human. Sometimes we don't catch everything or we don't catch it fast enough. And what if a spam member links to a bad neighborhood or lots of off-topic links? What if they do this in their signature and the link is suddenly and diabolically spread throughout your otherwise squeaky clean site? Especially on very large forums, once a thread falls off of page 1, it most likely isn't going to be respidered more than once (or twice if you're lucky).
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Nov 30th, 2005
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

There's quite a debate about this currently going on. I'm aware of one SEO forum that did it and they quickly lost most of their heavy hitters. I don't think they left because they didn't want to lose the links. I think it was more that they didn't agree with the concept. I do think however that if you don't have the personel to monitor the posts that it's difficult to stop the spammers. So it's your call I guess. One way to do it is to raise the number of post that a member must make before use the sig link. Then if they post junk just to get there you can weed em out before they reach the number. In most of the forums that I frequent, any spam draws attention like flies to a horse barn, and the posters either straighten up or are history. Most forum software gives you the option to not only ban, but to delete all or some of the posts from a particular user.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
fromthe5 is offline Offline
72 posts
since Oct 2005
Nov 30th, 2005
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

Speaking of spelling: make that "personnel" not "personel". It's getting late. lol
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
fromthe5 is offline Offline
72 posts
since Oct 2005
Dec 23rd, 2005
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

except for the Signature links rest should be done with rel=nofollow
Reputation Points: 11
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
seo_expert is offline Offline
60 posts
since May 2005
Jan 12th, 2006
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

In my opinion SEs dont even give much weight to links inside posts/signatures any more let alone ban a website because of them.
Reputation Points: 12
Solved Threads: 2
Junior Poster
Scribbller is offline Offline
193 posts
since Apr 2004
Jan 12th, 2006
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

Not true Get a link within a front page article on a high profile site and then try and say that links within articles don't do much On the contrary, it's these types of links that Google was designed to thrive on ... not little text links in sidebars and footers that are just there because people bought them.
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Jan 12th, 2006
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

Links from the Forums do count and are worth the efforts to be a member.

Google started to discount bought links or text ads which people buy for their websites.

It now prefers natural links..
Reputation Points: 11
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
seo_expert is offline Offline
60 posts
since May 2005
Jan 12th, 2006
0

Re: Rel=Nofollow

Google has always preferred and emphasized natural links. Link buying is just a practice to get around google's algorithm. Google has always taken efforts to counteract it.
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Search Engine Optimization Forum Timeline: Getting out of the Sandbox
Next Thread in Search Engine Optimization Forum Timeline: Latest Google Server





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC