954,224 Members — Technology Publication meets Social Media
Username:
Password:
Lost login information?
Have something to say? Contribute New Article Reply to this Article

difference between ror sitemap a google sitemap

Is there any difference between ror site map a google sitemap
Ror Sitemap is better than Google Sitemap or Google Sitemap is better than Ror Sitemap?
What do you think?

Jhon100
Junior Poster in Training
95 posts since Oct 2006
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

ROR sitemaps are completely useless. None of the search engines support them. But they all support the sitemaps.org format. Needless to say you want to use the on they support and ignore the one they don't.

stymiee
He's No Good To Me Dead
Moderator
3,360 posts since May 2006
Reputation Points: 161
Solved Threads: 38
 

Google sitemaps can be found by all engines by referring to them in the robots.txt file. For example, Sitemap: <a href="http://www.site.com/sitemap.xml">http://www.site.com/sitemap.xml</a>

cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
Administrator
19,421 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
 
ROR sitemaps are completely useless. None of the search engines support them. But they all support the sitemaps.org format. Needless to say you want to use the on they support and ignore the one they don't.


Thanks for your reply. Another question, Is a good idea have the the two sitemaps Google and Ror on a web?

Jhon100
Junior Poster in Training
95 posts since Oct 2006
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

There is absolutely no reason to have a Ror sitemap at all.

stymiee
He's No Good To Me Dead
Moderator
3,360 posts since May 2006
Reputation Points: 161
Solved Threads: 38
 

Ror sitemap promotes the concept of structural feeds or in XML format. While Google Sitemap creates a sitemap with HTML and images format

guinanie
Junior Poster
101 posts since Jul 2007
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

Actually a Google sitemap is in XML and is now the default format for all four major search engines. That's why Ror sitemaps are worthless. It's not only redundant but ignored by the search engines.

stymiee
He's No Good To Me Dead
Moderator
3,360 posts since May 2006
Reputation Points: 161
Solved Threads: 38
 

Thanks stymiee. Now I know that google sitemap is better that ROR sitemap.

x3mario
Posting Whiz
341 posts since Aug 2007
Reputation Points: 44
Solved Threads: 2
 

on our site http://www.punjabcolleges.com , google sitemaps page was showing about 25000 pages to be in database, however it had indexed only 6-7000 pages. when we did checking, we noticed that our sitemap format was not exactly as per google specification. it was more of a rss sitemap. we think that xml sitemap is the best of all solution as far as sitemap for search engines is concerned. but there should not be harm in maintaining ror sitemap too, though may not be of much advantage either.

goyalbb
Newbie Poster
1 post since Feb 2009
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

Google Sitemap is the best of all. You need to follow those standards for better results. If not things might get difficult for your website.

WebDave
Junior Poster
136 posts since Sep 2007
Reputation Points: 7
Solved Threads: 8
 
Is there any difference between ror site map a google sitemap Ror Sitemap is better than Google Sitemap or Google Sitemap is better than Ror Sitemap? What do you think?

I think google sitemap si better.

ruelpopo
Newbie Poster
3 posts since Feb 2009
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
 

This article has been dead for over three months

Post: Markdown Syntax: Formatting Help
You