| | |
Google "ends" Googlebombs; too late it seems
Please support our Search Engine Optimization advertiser: Get a Free SEO Analysis!
Google has announced that they have put an end to Googlebombs - for the moment. Previoulsy a search for "failure" would bring up George Bush's White House page, but as you can see, they've fixed it.
Specifically Google bombs are created by linking to some unused phrase that brings up irrelevant results when searching for the bombed phrase. The articles linked go into this in more depth.
It's been quite some time that the George Bush bomb has been on Google. At least a few years. If they claim they are against this kind of bombing, then WHY didn't they remove it? Basically their reason was this:
"Pranks like this may be distracting to some, but they don't affect the overall quality of our search service, whose objectivity, as always, remains the core of our mission."
Ah, so it doesn't matter if their search engine insults the president. As long as it's a good engine, one or 2 insults don't matter... They also state here:
"The next natural question to ask is 'Why doesn't Google just edit these search results by hand?' To answer that, you need to know a little bit about how Google works. When we're faced with a bad search result or a relevance problem,"
So THAT explains it. Google thinks that if George Bush doesn't show up under the search term "failure", then it's irrelevant. It's great to see how apolitical Google is these days. When they finally get around to fixing it, all they really do is change their search algorithm that "helps detect Googlebombs in many different languages". Well, let me tell you something: a human is A LOT smarter than a computer, and no matter how efficient and fast it is, this is certainly not the end of Googlebombs.
So sit back and let Google show us their brand new anti-bombinb techniques (and likely some other insulting phrase). What a pity.
Specifically Google bombs are created by linking to some unused phrase that brings up irrelevant results when searching for the bombed phrase. The articles linked go into this in more depth.
It's been quite some time that the George Bush bomb has been on Google. At least a few years. If they claim they are against this kind of bombing, then WHY didn't they remove it? Basically their reason was this:
"Pranks like this may be distracting to some, but they don't affect the overall quality of our search service, whose objectivity, as always, remains the core of our mission."
Ah, so it doesn't matter if their search engine insults the president. As long as it's a good engine, one or 2 insults don't matter... They also state here:
"The next natural question to ask is 'Why doesn't Google just edit these search results by hand?' To answer that, you need to know a little bit about how Google works. When we're faced with a bad search result or a relevance problem,"
So THAT explains it. Google thinks that if George Bush doesn't show up under the search term "failure", then it's irrelevant. It's great to see how apolitical Google is these days. When they finally get around to fixing it, all they really do is change their search algorithm that "helps detect Googlebombs in many different languages". Well, let me tell you something: a human is A LOT smarter than a computer, and no matter how efficient and fast it is, this is certainly not the end of Googlebombs.
So sit back and let Google show us their brand new anti-bombinb techniques (and likely some other insulting phrase). What a pity.
-7
•
•
•
•
It was 'miserable failure' rather than just 'failure' on its own as a search term that did the George Bush thing I think.
0
•
•
•
•
It will be interesting to see how effective their GoogleBomb detection will be - after all, GoogleBombing (in Google's eyes) looks very similar to what a viral marketing campaign will product - tons of links in a very small amount of time with similar anchor text.
Greg
Greg
0
•
•
•
•
> It was 'miserable failure' rather than just 'failure' on its own as a search term that did the George Bush thing I think.
It was actually both. But Google fixed 'em. Guaranteed until the next bug, like I always say.
It was actually both. But Google fixed 'em. Guaranteed until the next bug, like I always say.

0
•
•
•
•
if someone made a bomb that led from the search "error-prone to www.google.com, would they fix it more quickly, do you think?
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
> It was 'miserable failure' rather than just 'failure' on its own as a search term that did the George Bush thing I think.
It was actually both. But Google fixed 'em. Guaranteed until the next bug, like I always say.
Similar Threads
- "each new axis love", "bodyplatformplatform" and "modefrag error" (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Send mail in C code containing the "From", "To", "Subject", and "Message" parts (C)
- Removal of "Home Search Assistant", "Search Extender", & "Shopping Wizard" (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Help with Removal of "Home Search Assistant", "Search Extender", & "Shopping Wizard" (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Help with Removal of "Home Search Assistant", "Search Extender", & "Shopping Wizard" (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for bomb, engine, failure, google, search
acer adsense advertising amazon analytics android aol api apple bing blackberry blogger blogging bomb browser business cellphone chrome cloudcomputing code coding congress copyright data database development doubleclick earnings email engine europe facebook failure g1 gmail google googledocs googleearth government hardware hp ibm icahn internet iphone java linux malware maps marketing mcafee media microsoft mobile monetization msn mysql netbook netbooks networking news office pagerank palm php privacy programming publishing revenue rss saas search searchengine security seo serps sex socialnetwork socialnetworking software spyware statistics t-mobile technologystocks twitter uk verizon video vista wave web webmaster website wiki wikipedia windows wolframalpha yahoo yahoo! youtube




