Reply

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,050
Reputation: John A is a splendid one to behold John A is a splendid one to behold John A is a splendid one to behold John A is a splendid one to behold John A is a splendid one to behold John A is a splendid one to behold John A is a splendid one to behold John A is a splendid one to behold 
Solved Threads: 331
Moderator
John A's Avatar
John A John A is offline Offline
Vampirical Lurker

Blackjack vs Blackberry

 
0
  #1
Dec 12th, 2006
Research In Motion (RIM) is now suing the hand held maker Samsung, claiming that Samsung's new product named "Blackjack", released earlier last month, is causing lost revenues and misleading consumers into thinking that Blackjack is another product in the Blackberry line.

Now at first thought, the names don't seem very similar. In fact, I was wondering why RIM was even bothering to do a lawsuit other then to make money, rather than "making up lost revenues". But you'll understand when you see the actual pictures of these devices. They're so similar, no wonder RIM is claiming that they're losing revenue:
Blackjack:
http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/im...Jack-Small.jpg
(image from smartphonethoughts.com)

Blackberry:
http://www.shopforphones.info/images...berry-7290.jpg
(image from shopeforphones.info)

It's amazing that Samsung thought they could get away with this one. They're nearly identical in weight and size, and there's very little modifications made from the Blackberry design. Samsung's changed the market though. They've changed the device so that it's more aiming towards the entertainment market, with a built in MP3 player and a lower price tag then its Blackberry equivalent.

RIM said in the court statement, "Samsung, by wrongfully using the BlackJack mark in commerce, is tarnishing, blurring, diluting, and/or disparaging RIM's reputation and goodwill, as well as RIM's famous BlackBerry Marks." A Samsung spokesmen declined to comment on the lawsuit.

The funny thing is that if Samsung hadn't have made the design and name so similar to RIM's, they probably would have had a pretty good chance of success with the device. The device is attractively priced at $199 with a contract, and who doesn't like an MP3 player? Unfortunately, Samsung decided they just had to be a copycat. I can only hope that Samsung loses in this lawsuit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,605
Reputation: 'Stein is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 104
Team Colleague
'Stein's Avatar
'Stein 'Stein is offline Offline
Lapsed Skeptic
 
0
  #2
Dec 13th, 2006
I can only hope that Samsung loses in this lawsuit.
Roger that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
Reputation: Joni81 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
Joni81 Joni81 is offline Offline
Newbie Poster
 
0
  #3
Feb 14th, 2008
The word blackjack cannot be patented thats is abolsutely stupid.
Just because of the similiarity of the words it doesnt mean that they are trying to steal their brand name .. thats bs in my book

And its not even real blackjack like playing online i do play online how many of you guys actually play blackjack for money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Other Threads in the Cellphones, PDAs and Handheld Devices Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC