| | |
Blackjack vs Blackberry
![]() |
Research In Motion (RIM) is now suing the hand held maker Samsung, claiming that Samsung's new product named "Blackjack", released earlier last month, is causing lost revenues and misleading consumers into thinking that Blackjack is another product in the Blackberry line.
Now at first thought, the names don't seem very similar. In fact, I was wondering why RIM was even bothering to do a lawsuit other then to make money, rather than "making up lost revenues". But you'll understand when you see the actual pictures of these devices. They're so similar, no wonder RIM is claiming that they're losing revenue:
Blackjack:
http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/im...Jack-Small.jpg
(image from smartphonethoughts.com)
Blackberry:
http://www.shopforphones.info/images...berry-7290.jpg
(image from shopeforphones.info)
It's amazing that Samsung thought they could get away with this one. They're nearly identical in weight and size, and there's very little modifications made from the Blackberry design. Samsung's changed the market though. They've changed the device so that it's more aiming towards the entertainment market, with a built in MP3 player and a lower price tag then its Blackberry equivalent.
RIM said in the court statement, "Samsung, by wrongfully using the BlackJack mark in commerce, is tarnishing, blurring, diluting, and/or disparaging RIM's reputation and goodwill, as well as RIM's famous BlackBerry Marks." A Samsung spokesmen declined to comment on the lawsuit.
The funny thing is that if Samsung hadn't have made the design and name so similar to RIM's, they probably would have had a pretty good chance of success with the device. The device is attractively priced at $199 with a contract, and who doesn't like an MP3 player? Unfortunately, Samsung decided they just had to be a copycat. I can only hope that Samsung loses in this lawsuit.
Now at first thought, the names don't seem very similar. In fact, I was wondering why RIM was even bothering to do a lawsuit other then to make money, rather than "making up lost revenues". But you'll understand when you see the actual pictures of these devices. They're so similar, no wonder RIM is claiming that they're losing revenue:
Blackjack:
http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/im...Jack-Small.jpg
(image from smartphonethoughts.com)
Blackberry:
http://www.shopforphones.info/images...berry-7290.jpg
(image from shopeforphones.info)
It's amazing that Samsung thought they could get away with this one. They're nearly identical in weight and size, and there's very little modifications made from the Blackberry design. Samsung's changed the market though. They've changed the device so that it's more aiming towards the entertainment market, with a built in MP3 player and a lower price tag then its Blackberry equivalent.
RIM said in the court statement, "Samsung, by wrongfully using the BlackJack mark in commerce, is tarnishing, blurring, diluting, and/or disparaging RIM's reputation and goodwill, as well as RIM's famous BlackBerry Marks." A Samsung spokesmen declined to comment on the lawsuit.
The funny thing is that if Samsung hadn't have made the design and name so similar to RIM's, they probably would have had a pretty good chance of success with the device. The device is attractively priced at $199 with a contract, and who doesn't like an MP3 player? Unfortunately, Samsung decided they just had to be a copycat. I can only hope that Samsung loses in this lawsuit.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
0
#3 Feb 14th, 2008
The word blackjack cannot be patented thats is abolsutely stupid.
Just because of the similiarity of the words it doesnt mean that they are trying to steal their brand name .. thats bs in my book
And its not even real blackjack like playing online i do play online how many of you guys actually play blackjack for money?
Just because of the similiarity of the words it doesnt mean that they are trying to steal their brand name .. thats bs in my book
And its not even real blackjack like playing online i do play online how many of you guys actually play blackjack for money?
![]() |
Other Threads in the Cellphones, PDAs and Handheld Devices Forum
- Previous Thread: Which Verizon PDA to go with?
- Next Thread: Do you think this will work?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
3.1.2 @home aliph amazon amd android apple appliances asus att bbc blackberry bluetooth bugs cellphone cloudcomputing computing condor cray dell developer device devices e-reader ebook ebooks facebook filesharing force.com fun gadget gadgets games gaming gridcomputing hack hardware highperformancecomputing history innovations intel inventions iphone ipod irex kindle law lilyallen lowvoltage magazines messaging microsoft mobile mobile-phone mp3 music nannycams netbook netbooklaptop news nintendo nokia p2p patents pc phone porn portable ps3 publishing queen report research rim saas samsung satellite sexting smartphone sms sony spies statistics supercomputing technology teens time-inc toshiba tv uk unlock voicerecorders warning wii wireless xbox xbox360 xeon zune zunehd






